wildlife photographer of the year results are out. There are some stunning photos. Some i'm not so sure about and some that look a little bit artificial.

In my opinion i don't really like the over all winner but i suppose he's being rewarded for the dificulty of the subject rather than the artistic content.

For me the frog and the snake is the best shot. What are your thoughts? I know some photos on here could compete with some of the ones that got coommended.

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/onlineGallery.do

Poor site for this subject pics are far too small.

I think only those with zero manipulation should be eligible, all the others should be compared purely on artistic and aesthetic levels, and computer skill in a seperate category.