View Full Version : John or Paul (or George) - the best Beatle singer?


Ousetunes
07-10-2008, 14:11
Who, in your most humble opinion, was the better or even best singer in the Beatles? Who was the best singer even when their Beatle days had passed? Was it the raucous Lennon tearing his larynx to pieces on Twist and Shout or wailing like a banshee on Yer Blues? Or was it Uncle Paul with his comfy, gentle voice singing Yesterday or Here, There And Everywhere?

Maybe you preferred dear old George and the husky tones of You Like Me Too Much or the slightly weak but attractively delicate vocal on The Inner Light? Maybe Ringo even...oh; leave that one for another day, huh?

On purpose though, I've portrayed each Beatle in the erroneous light generally given when summing up each Beatle's vocal style. Lennon as the rock and roll belter, Paul the crooner and George as the weaker-but-still-decent singer.

Which, of course, just won't do with me!

Because for every Lennon singing Bad Boy, there's a Paul singing I'm Down or Kansas City. For every Paul singing The Long And Winding Road, there's a Lennon singing Julia or Girl. The fact being, that for all the labels the media attached to the Beatles, they were wrong because all of them were good singers who could deliver in a variety of styles. Even George, in the early days had quite a nice little rock and roll voice, distorting nicely on stuff like Three Cool Cats and Roll Over Beethoven.

However, Paul was, and would be the most versatile vocalist both with and beyond the Beatles. George was restricted but at least knew his vocal limits. Lennon could rock with the best, be gentle and soothing but rarely had a 'somewhere inbetween'. Thus, it's hard to state which was, by definition, the best singer but I think, outside of the Beatles, their reputations as rock and roll or ballady singers takes a bit of a twist.

Paul's voice never sounded better as a rock singer than when he fronted Wings. He out-Lennoned Lennon on stuff like Let Me Roll It and Soily. Even today, listening to Wings Over America, his voice astonishes me. Lennon, once he'd moved on from the Instant Karmas and Power To The Peoples, gave us some beautiful, melodic and gently yearning vocals on Imagine (the album) but the best a few years later on Walls And Bridges, an album which truly captured the beauty in Lennon's singing voice (Bless You, #9 Dream and Scared. Also, Old Dirt Road). Both Beatles, in their 30s showing us just how good they were as singers (and reminding us of just how young they were when they were Beatles).

George rarely stretched his vocals but he could also sing with feeling and emotion. Songs like Soft Hearted Hanna, Your Love Is Forever and Someplace Else; beautifully sung and always in a setting where you awaited the guitar break or slide solo.

And in a strange way, I'll end on these little notes, that Paul McCartney sung Long Tall Sally in one take (a live session, music and vocal recorded in one) and Lennon did likewise on Twist And Shout (his voice had gone by the time a second attempt was made). Paul's finest rock vocal is on a throw away little song called The Pound Is Sinking (Tug Of War, 1982) - listen to the middle eight - and for my money, Lennon's Jealous Guy is the most beautiful vocal he ever recorded. With the Beatles, the Anthology version of It's Only Love shows a great, hoarsy rock vocal.

And stranger still, I loved George's voice - and still do - more than the others. 'Let me in here, I know I've been here' - sublime and so George.

mikeG
07-10-2008, 14:13
I think John had the most memorable voice - and the strongest.

not wanted
07-10-2008, 14:57
John, I think he had a truly great rock n roll voice

NEKRO138
07-10-2008, 15:14
As much as I enjoy their songs, I don't actually like any of their voices particuarly. If I had to choose, it would be George for me too.

pk014b7161
07-10-2008, 16:35
john lennon.......................

cressida
07-10-2008, 18:15
John (although favouritewas George) he had a most distinctive voice and contributed the most to the 'Beatle Sound'

AJ sheffield
07-10-2008, 18:58
John lennons voice was really powerful, in fact I heard it could actually damage kids hearing.

JenC
09-10-2008, 09:38
I'd agree with other people's views that John had the most distinctive voice, and was probably the one to use his voice in as many different ways as possible.

However, it doesn't mean to say he was my preferred Beatles singer. That would ofcourse go to George. He had a beautiful voice which on songs such as While My Guitar Gently Weeps (anthology version), sounds slightly melancholy but stunning at the same time.

(by the way Ousetunes, I tried to reply to your last PM but your inbox was full :))

Ousetunes
09-10-2008, 09:53
(by the way Ousetunes, I tried to reply to your last PM but your inbox was full :))


I've done some deleting.:thumbsup:

Agree with the Anthology version of WMGGW. I heard this in all its unadorned glory inside studio 2 at Abbey Road some 25 years ago. It was hair-raising stuff, like George being there in person.

summer1955
09-10-2008, 19:30
its got to be john for me

EdnaKrabappe
09-10-2008, 19:37
I'm going to be pedantic and say Paul, She's leaving home being my favourite. Although as I've got older, my taste has gone more over to the Lennon numbers.

Muffin Man
10-10-2008, 08:36
It may be cooler to say John was the best, but I don't believe that he was.

Paul was by far the best and most versatile singer in the Beatles. John was exceptional too, but Paul could do everything Lennon did and more besides.

George was a great backing singer, but he sang lead a lot more in the early days. He took lead vocals on many songs in the Hamburg days and on the Decca audition material he sings several songs that John and Paul took over when they were recorded for EMI.

JA5E
10-10-2008, 10:32
I'd have to say Paul....but only just!

His vocals on his solo version of 'Why don't we do it in the Road' (on Anthology 3) is excellent.

Tarquin
10-10-2008, 12:05
Macca for me;far greater range

JenC
14-11-2008, 16:04
I'd have to say Paul....but only just!

His vocals on his solo version of 'Why don't we do it in the Road' (on Anthology 3) is excellent.

I agree, and his vocals are great on the album version too. It's just a shame his voice has deteriorated quite a bit now - but he is 66, I suppose it's understandable.

cressida
14-11-2008, 16:21
John Lennon for me his voice is more distinctive and has more oomph

Ousetunes
14-11-2008, 16:44
John Lennon for me his voice is more distinctive and has more oomph

More distinctive, yes; but more oomph, that's debateable.

Macca had a very powerful rock voice whilst a Beatle. Listen to Long Tall Sally, Kansas City, I'm Down, Helter Skelter, Birthday and Oh Darling. In fact, regarding Oh Darling, I doubt Lennon could have given a performance as stunning as Paul did (although he did pop round to the studio before the others arrived to get his voice ready).

But Lennon was great on Yer Blues, Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except Me And My Monkey and I Want You (She's So Heavy). And of course, Twist And Shout.

But as JenC rightly points out, dig Macca's vocal on Why Don't We Do It In The Road. No wonder Lennon was barking mad because he wanted to be involved in that recording!

poppins
14-11-2008, 16:49
Didn't know any of them were singers :gag:

JenC
14-11-2008, 16:50
In fact, regarding Oh Darling, I doubt Lennon could have given a performance as stunning as Paul did (although he did pop round to the studio before the others arrived to get his voice ready).


I couldn't imagine John doing vocals on Oh! Darling at all; Paul's voice suits it so well, and this is a song where he certainly does give it some 'oomph'!

shanes teeth
15-11-2008, 12:12
What's Ringo done wrong to get ignored ?

cressida
15-11-2008, 12:17
I think John Lennon had more impact in personality and voice, but then I don't really like ballads, my favourite Beatle was George and I liked his voice and songs too, particularly 'Something' Sinatra liked it too.

Ousetunes
15-11-2008, 12:37
Cressida - wouldn't you class 'Something' as a ballad? If not, then what is it?

Sinatra indeed liked 'Something' erroneously introducing it as 'a classic Lennon & McCartney song'. The muppet!

cressida
15-11-2008, 13:05
Cressida - wouldn't you class 'Something' as a ballad? If not, then what is it?

Sinatra indeed liked 'Something' erroneously introducing it as 'a classic Lennon & McCartney song'. The muppet!


Perhaps, but as it was by George somewhat more appealing than others, but in general I prefer up tempo music - perks me up;)


Although not a Sinatra fan I wouldn't describe him as such, he was after all a legend in the music industry :D

JenC
15-11-2008, 14:52
What's Ringo done wrong to get ignored ?

Feel free to put a case forward for Ringo :P

Ousetunes
15-11-2008, 15:04
Regarding Ringo as a vocalist. As Loyd Grossman used to say in Through The keyhole, 'let's look at the evidence'.

His vocal on Boys is actually quite good (but I'd guess he was still relatively new to the other Beatles - and of course, George Martin) so had to 'bring something to the table'.

His next vocal cut, later in 1963 was I Wanna Be Your Man which he double-tracked and on which, like Boys, he relied on backing vocals from the other Beatles. Interesting to note that on their next album, A Hard Day's Night, he didn't get a vocal track.

Honey Don't on Beatles For Sale is run-of-the-mill C & W (clearly where Martin and the other Beatles thought best to put him) and Act Naturally was a slightly more interesting song. He doesn't sing badly, he just...well, sings. Then on Rubber Soul we get What Goes On, hardly at the top of Lennon-McCartney list of wonderful songs (forget the Lennon-McCartney-Starkey tag; Ringo contributed about one line).

Yellow Submarine could only be sung by him (as near to a fast-forward track I get when running through the Beatles albums) BUT incredibly, in 1967 we got With A Little Help From My Friends - by a huge distance, the best vocal he ever recorded (with the Beatles and without). Maybe helped by way of a substance or two, plus some varispeed, his vocal is very, very good.

Don't Pass Me By is a mess but Octopus's Garden is not very bad at all. I'm doing this all from memory so apologies if I've missed a song or two out.

Solo-wise, Back Off Boogaloo is okay, It Don't Come Easy suits him but again, he pulls out all the stops on Photograph. (un)Fortunately, Harrison's husky harmonies are more interesting still so one forgets Ringo's singing.

I'm not trying to diss Ringo - he was a drummer with an okay voice.