firstly - is it even right to do this kind of thing? i mean it shattered the stereotypes of gay men, with the winner Ben turning out to be gay, but it caused unnecessary pain for the woman, and encouraged them all to lie, just for money.
Although in the end, the guy who won all the money did split it with the woman and was really upset about lying to her, but should he really have done it in the first place?

secondly - that woman had the worst gaydar i've ever seen

thirdly - what's the point? it isn't even very riveting t.v. (although it's the kind of thing that's so bad, you have to watch it :thumbsup: )

anywayy.. just wondering your opinions..

what a pile of tosh......

as for hurting a woman's feelings...........she was picking men from eachother by virture of what she thought of them and their sexuality.........HELLO??? I think she and they knew what they were getting into.............

the programme was shallow and useless........so it showed that some gay men look and acted "straight" and showed that some straight men are and can be "campy"

again it shows a preoccupation of people to put others into little boxes................................

by putting money in the agenda rather than making it a quiz between actors, it made it more important and distatefull than it actually was

grow up television, watching christioans thrown to lions went out with the romans