nightrider
09-05-2005, 10:23
Can you believe they sentenced a cat to be beheaded?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4524059.stm
why cant they put it down with some injections - wouldnt that be more humane?
valentine
09-05-2005, 10:26
That is so sick, like you say injections would be more humane, I can't believe anyone would come up with the idea of beheading a cat
cgksheff
09-05-2005, 10:58
I am willing to bet that the court has not actually ruled that the cat should be killed by beheading.
It is more likely that it has said that the head should be removed for medical examination of the brain to verify the rabies infection. (... after it has been killed)
This is not unusual.
If you read the article carefully it does not actually say "death by beheading".
I make no comment on whether it should be killed in the first place or not.
SteveWilson
09-05-2005, 10:59
AS HAS BEEN SAID BEFORE "ONLY IN THE AMERICAS"......
Originally posted by cgksheff
I am willing to bet that the court has not actually ruled that the cat should be killed by beheading.
It is more likely that it has said that the head should be removed for medical examination of the brain to verify the rabies infection. (... after it has been killed)
This is not unusual.
If you read the article carefully it does not actually say "death by beheading".
I make no comment on whether it should be killed in the first place or not.
It is in Chile though. Don't forget we used to condone the removal of royalty's heads ;)
babycakes8
09-05-2005, 11:30
really?? im very intrigued
Originally posted by babycakes8
really?? im very intrigued
Is that for me or the original poster?
nightrider
09-05-2005, 12:19
Originally posted by cgksheff
I am willing to bet that the court has not actually ruled that the cat should be killed by beheading.
It is more likely that it has said that the head should be removed for medical examination of the brain to verify the rabies infection. (... after it has been killed)
This is not unusual.
If you read the article carefully it does not actually say "death by beheading".
I make no comment on whether it should be killed in the first place or not.
true. It does imply it by not specifying the method of execution. You are probably right though. It would be rather odd to behead a live cat...