katkin
28-07-2008, 03:16 PM
It always grieves me that GPs, Health Professionals and do-gooders are so quick to advise people to ‘get rid of the cat’ if allergies, illness or pregnancy are diagnosed, as I suffer from allergic rhinitis myself (not just your common or garden hay-fever, this is all-year round torment) and my other half is asthmatic.
If a doctor told either or us to ditch the dobermutt, our 8 felines and the cockatiel, she or he better be standing on the other side of a sturdy 6 foot fence and away from sharp implements, because it simply ain’t gonna happen!
Through a combination of good housekeeping, medication and common sense, we’ve already worked out how we can live alongside our furries and recognise the health benefits and pleasures that owning pet(s) can bring. The option to eradicate our ailments by removing all trace of animal life from our lives, simply isn’t an option.
I’m also suspicious of a medical expert’s motives, when they so readily advocate removing a much-loved pet the moment someone in the family starts wheezing or sneezing…do these people not like animals, I wonder? And what evidence is there that removing the pet will actually remove or reduce the allergy?
Recently, I was fortunate enough to attend a conference where one of the speakers gave a talk on just such a subject.
In ‘Do I have to give up my cat?’ Dr June McNicholas, a renowned psychologist http://www.cawc.org.uk/mcnicholas specialising in human health and the role of companion animals, cited a wealth of medical evidence and helped to dispel the many myths relating to cat compatibility with asthma and toxoplasmosis (two of the most common reasons why cats end up in rescue, often on the advice of medical professionals or well-meaning but misinformed family and friends). Her talk demonstrated a wealth of medical evidence is out there, suggesting that steps can be taken to avoid having to give up a much loved pet.
Research such as:
* Children who have pet animals at home have stronger immune systems and are less likely to take days off school sick, a study suggests. Researchers at Warwick University in Coventry found that having a cat or dog exposed children to more infections early in life. However, this exposure boosted their immune systems in the medium term and meant these children attended school more often, on average, than pupils who did not have pets. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2045704.stm
* Numerous studies showing pet allergens remain in the home as long as 6 months after removal of the pet and that removal of a cat from the family home does not reduce or remove contact with pet dander- schools, libraries, hospitals and other public places are literally riddled with the stuff
http://www.catspro-northants.org.uk/leaflets/asthmanews.pdf
* Evidence suggests that children who grow up with a cat in the house may be protected against future development of asthmatic symptoms. http://www.cats.org.uk/media/news_detail.asp?id=130
* Reducing levels of household allergens, such as cat fur and dust mites, is unlikely to have a major impact on cutting asthma and allergies in children, a study suggested today. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-319868/Cats-dust-wont-cause-asthma.html
And, whilst the medical experts may be quick to suggest a pet is the cause of the problem- how many of them actually arrange for the affected child or person to have allergy tests to confirm this diagnosis?
We've managed it, by reducing the soft furnishings, switching to leather and easily hoovered or washable surfaces (including sealed wooden floors- a dream to clean compared with stuffy old carpets!), making sure our pets are well-groomed and well-fed (diet has a lot to do with coat condition and the amount of dander in the atmosphere), acquiring a steam cleaner and air purifiers to eradicate dust and house mites and by making sure we take our medications. We simply could not imagine a home without our pets.
I fully appreciate that there will always be situations where the illness is so severe it is simply not possible to mix pet and person, but I strongly urge people in a similar position to consider all the options, before resorting to last resort- getting rid of the family pet.
If a doctor told either or us to ditch the dobermutt, our 8 felines and the cockatiel, she or he better be standing on the other side of a sturdy 6 foot fence and away from sharp implements, because it simply ain’t gonna happen!
Through a combination of good housekeeping, medication and common sense, we’ve already worked out how we can live alongside our furries and recognise the health benefits and pleasures that owning pet(s) can bring. The option to eradicate our ailments by removing all trace of animal life from our lives, simply isn’t an option.
I’m also suspicious of a medical expert’s motives, when they so readily advocate removing a much-loved pet the moment someone in the family starts wheezing or sneezing…do these people not like animals, I wonder? And what evidence is there that removing the pet will actually remove or reduce the allergy?
Recently, I was fortunate enough to attend a conference where one of the speakers gave a talk on just such a subject.
In ‘Do I have to give up my cat?’ Dr June McNicholas, a renowned psychologist http://www.cawc.org.uk/mcnicholas specialising in human health and the role of companion animals, cited a wealth of medical evidence and helped to dispel the many myths relating to cat compatibility with asthma and toxoplasmosis (two of the most common reasons why cats end up in rescue, often on the advice of medical professionals or well-meaning but misinformed family and friends). Her talk demonstrated a wealth of medical evidence is out there, suggesting that steps can be taken to avoid having to give up a much loved pet.
Research such as:
* Children who have pet animals at home have stronger immune systems and are less likely to take days off school sick, a study suggests. Researchers at Warwick University in Coventry found that having a cat or dog exposed children to more infections early in life. However, this exposure boosted their immune systems in the medium term and meant these children attended school more often, on average, than pupils who did not have pets. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2045704.stm
* Numerous studies showing pet allergens remain in the home as long as 6 months after removal of the pet and that removal of a cat from the family home does not reduce or remove contact with pet dander- schools, libraries, hospitals and other public places are literally riddled with the stuff
http://www.catspro-northants.org.uk/leaflets/asthmanews.pdf
* Evidence suggests that children who grow up with a cat in the house may be protected against future development of asthmatic symptoms. http://www.cats.org.uk/media/news_detail.asp?id=130
* Reducing levels of household allergens, such as cat fur and dust mites, is unlikely to have a major impact on cutting asthma and allergies in children, a study suggested today. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-319868/Cats-dust-wont-cause-asthma.html
And, whilst the medical experts may be quick to suggest a pet is the cause of the problem- how many of them actually arrange for the affected child or person to have allergy tests to confirm this diagnosis?
We've managed it, by reducing the soft furnishings, switching to leather and easily hoovered or washable surfaces (including sealed wooden floors- a dream to clean compared with stuffy old carpets!), making sure our pets are well-groomed and well-fed (diet has a lot to do with coat condition and the amount of dander in the atmosphere), acquiring a steam cleaner and air purifiers to eradicate dust and house mites and by making sure we take our medications. We simply could not imagine a home without our pets.
I fully appreciate that there will always be situations where the illness is so severe it is simply not possible to mix pet and person, but I strongly urge people in a similar position to consider all the options, before resorting to last resort- getting rid of the family pet.