Neil, it's a MINIMUM number of minutes to be played on the boards.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/crystal_palace/7271421.stm

Nothings changed then for him- he was moaning left ,right and centre when at Sheff Utd..

"Colin" misses the point! The four minutes shown is a MINIMUM of four minutes.

Unless he's arguing that there were no stoppages during injury time, in which case he has some feeble sort of argument. Either way, it's still the referee's sole decision when time is up.

I watched that game but can't recall the bits and bobs of added time except that Palace were on the ropes. I felt sorry for Palace when the equaliser went in because I think Warnock has done a good job and it compared well with what Robson had achieved!
I certainly remember Bristol City being awarded an extremely dubious penalty near the end and Speroni saved the penalty and the follow-up (brilliantly). Palace were sure to be disappointed at the end. When it comes to officials, I tend to agree with what Warnock says and I think this referee gave cause for criticism.
Since the good run, Palace have slipped a little and Robson is unemployed - I have no other reason to a Palace allegiance.

I agree with Chairboy. Eagles were on a good run and in the play off position not long ago- then it went a bit downhill so maybe that is why Warnock is on the war path.

I agree with Chairboy. Eagles were on a good run and in the play off position not long ago- then it went a bit downhill so maybe that is why Warnock is on the war path.

Cheers but I think Warnock made the comments to Sky immediately after the match. I think the FA has just got round to deciding there is a case to answer, which there probably is. We never get to hear what they (or the assessor) say to officials though.