julado
16-01-2008, 23:26
Did you watch the documentary on BBC2....I could have cried.
If you didn't here's a little background information (apologies it is from the Daily Mail :hihi:)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=508495&in_page_id=1879
I wasn't shocked at what I saw because I already knew about the situation.....you will notice in the news article a reference to a radio station.....that is how I knew....and this was months ago.
All I can say is this from what the programme portrayed I didn't feel that the children cared too much about what would happen to Norman. That his son sold Norman's precious cars and motorbike without his approval. That the daughter was not prepared to go to look after her father for two very lame reasons....impending divorce and that she had to take care of an elderly DOG.
But IMHO the programme was biased....because it omitted the fact that Norman's children had stopped his closest friends from visiting him in the care home. It omitted that they are preparing to sell his home. It omitted that Norman is without some of the things he calls precious...things that connect him to his fame and he is familiar with. All this was revealed by the radio station but that would put Norman's children in a bad light had those things been included in tonight's documentary.
Some MONTHS ago (after the radio programme) and after doing a bit of research I sent a card and a letter to Norman telling him that he had made my disabled son laugh and how important that was to me and how I had watched his films as a child. Most of my letter was just chit chat...in bite size pieces that I think he would have been able to understand.
I got a response and it was nothing less than I had expected and confirmed to me all the worries the radio presenter had - the letter I received was from the manager of the care home....it was curt and precise informing me that SIR Norman had seen my letter and said thank you....HOWEVER....further correspondence from the public or the media will not be encouraged.
I took this to mean that one of our greatest performers will not even be able to receive post from the outside world....and that is a worry that indicates to both the radio presenter and ME that he has been "parked" in a place convenient for his children with no provision made to deal with things connected to Norman's fame.
Norman loved his home on the Isle of Man and IMHO there must be enough money for his family to have been able to employ carers to look after his needs round the clock IN HIS OWN HOME. There are also retirement homes especially for theatricals....one I understand not so far away from his son's house in Sussex.
From what I understand people with dementia can sometimes connect with familiar things - photographs and other memorabilia....apparently he has nothing like that with him.
And if you look at the very bottom of the news article at the comments left...DerekS of Dundee's remarks sums it up perfectly for me.
All I can say is what a shame.....and God bless Norman :love:
If you didn't here's a little background information (apologies it is from the Daily Mail :hihi:)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=508495&in_page_id=1879
I wasn't shocked at what I saw because I already knew about the situation.....you will notice in the news article a reference to a radio station.....that is how I knew....and this was months ago.
All I can say is this from what the programme portrayed I didn't feel that the children cared too much about what would happen to Norman. That his son sold Norman's precious cars and motorbike without his approval. That the daughter was not prepared to go to look after her father for two very lame reasons....impending divorce and that she had to take care of an elderly DOG.
But IMHO the programme was biased....because it omitted the fact that Norman's children had stopped his closest friends from visiting him in the care home. It omitted that they are preparing to sell his home. It omitted that Norman is without some of the things he calls precious...things that connect him to his fame and he is familiar with. All this was revealed by the radio station but that would put Norman's children in a bad light had those things been included in tonight's documentary.
Some MONTHS ago (after the radio programme) and after doing a bit of research I sent a card and a letter to Norman telling him that he had made my disabled son laugh and how important that was to me and how I had watched his films as a child. Most of my letter was just chit chat...in bite size pieces that I think he would have been able to understand.
I got a response and it was nothing less than I had expected and confirmed to me all the worries the radio presenter had - the letter I received was from the manager of the care home....it was curt and precise informing me that SIR Norman had seen my letter and said thank you....HOWEVER....further correspondence from the public or the media will not be encouraged.
I took this to mean that one of our greatest performers will not even be able to receive post from the outside world....and that is a worry that indicates to both the radio presenter and ME that he has been "parked" in a place convenient for his children with no provision made to deal with things connected to Norman's fame.
Norman loved his home on the Isle of Man and IMHO there must be enough money for his family to have been able to employ carers to look after his needs round the clock IN HIS OWN HOME. There are also retirement homes especially for theatricals....one I understand not so far away from his son's house in Sussex.
From what I understand people with dementia can sometimes connect with familiar things - photographs and other memorabilia....apparently he has nothing like that with him.
And if you look at the very bottom of the news article at the comments left...DerekS of Dundee's remarks sums it up perfectly for me.
All I can say is what a shame.....and God bless Norman :love: