So Charles to marry the women that destroyed Diana.


I hope they make prince william the next King. What will the world think putting a slapper (camilla) on the thrown as queen.

dont you mean a rottweiller.

It wasn't Camilla who destroyed Diana - it takes two to have an affair! Let them get married and get on with it, it's clearly been going to happen for years.
There's no way Charles will ever be on the throne anyway, it'll go straight to William, surely?

I'm glad he's found happiness, but there's no need for him to flaunt his relationship. He should have tried to make his relationship with Diana work instead of chasing after Camilla, because she was already married. It's an appalling state of affairs - no pun intended!

I think the pair of them should move away somewhere quiet and keep out of the public eye from now on.

i don't think she's look out of place on a monday at the cannons giro club...proper minger

Originally posted by Narcosis
So Charles to marry the women that destroyed Diana.

I think Diana did a pretty good job of destroying herself by hurtling down a Paris tunnel at 100mph.

They've been together for years and years - why shouldn't they marry? Who cares if she's a 'minger' - Charles isn't Brad Pitt is he!!
I don't see it as anyone's business but their own. Good luck to them!

Originally posted by Greenback
I think Diana did a pretty good job of destroying herself by hurtling down a Paris tunnel at 100mph.



She wasnt driving. DUHHHH

Originally posted by Narcosis
She wasnt driving. DUHHHH

Yeah, I suppose the driver had the authority to take it upon himself to travel at such speed...

neither was camilla.

Camilla can't be queen anyway. She is not a blood relation.

Originally posted by roughy101
dont you mean a rottweiller.

I think that comment is so nasty and uncalled for. You should retract that statement forthwith and be ashamed of yourself for even thinking it let alone having the temerity to put it on an open forum such as this RETRACT IT AT ONCE !















MY Rotty is distraught at being compared to that horse faced Moo :P :P :P :P

Each to there own - he can marry her by name but he knows there is no way that she will be fully accepted!!!!

There is no way that the throne will go straight to william- it sounds ideal but charles WILL be king for a time.

I was 2 days old when he was last married :D :D

Originally posted by Greenback
Yeah, I suppose the driver had the authority to take it upon himself to travel at such speed...





Interesting comment, considering the only survivor an X Royal Marine security guard. Doesnt remember what happend!

So how do you know she gave the authority!

Why are some of you so nasty and self-righteous?

How does it affect you who Charles Windsor marries and what she looks like? Why do you care enough to post about it?

No matter how ugly you and your partners look to everyone else, you appear appealing and attractive to one another I imagine - well, they look at each other through the eyes of love and comfort too ...

My grandmother always said "if you can't say anything pleasant, don't say anything at all" of course that's not as much fun as slagging off people who can't answer back, is it?

no offence, lol....

Originally posted by Narcosis
Interesting comment, considering the only survivor an X Royal Marine security guard. Doesnt remember what happend!

So how do you know she gave the authority!

She was aristocracy. Aristocracy decides what speed to drive at, regardless of conspiracy theories found on the pages of the National Enquirer, etc.

Anyway... as for the whole Charlie-Camilla thing, judging by the public outcry against this woman (mainly because she's pretty ugly, which is obviously a horrendous crime) at least the impending marriage should bring the revolution a step closer.

Has anyone else spotted the resembelance between Parker-Bowles and the late Rod Hull?

Originally posted by Narcosis
She wasnt driving. DUHHHH

Duh yourself! She was an adult. She got into a car being driven by and man who had suposededly been drinking and may I remind you she WAS NOT wearing a seatbelt. The only person in the car wearing a seatbelt survived.

Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew hoe to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.

I am not a Royalist and would gladly pension the lot of them off tomorrow but Charles deserves to be happy and I am delighted that he is going to betrothed to the woman he truly loves. :clap:

Originally posted by Swan_Vesta
Has anyone else spotted the resembelance between Parker-Bowles and the late Rod Hull?

Don't you mean his Emu . . . cos that is still alive - Now we know where!

Originally posted by Swan_Vesta
Has anyone else spotted the resembelance between Parker-Bowles and the late Rod Hull?

The resembelance of the Monkey that you have displayed looks more like Camilla Farter Bowles.

Let's hope he does the same as the other prince who married a divorcee and sod's off and lives in Paris, he might even get to drive through "the tunnel" and leave a few flowers. :(

The thing is - everyone has the right to be ugly, but she just abuses the priviledge. :gag:

Well the standard of debate on here is just stunning. I wonder why you bother.

Originally posted by Mo
Duh yourself! She was an adult. She got into a car being driven by and man who had suposededly been drinking and may I remind you she WAS NOT wearing a seatbelt. The only person in the car wearing a seatbelt survived.

Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew hoe to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.

I am not a Royalist and would gladly pension the lot of them off tomorrow but Charles deserves to be happy and I am delighted that he is going to betrothed to the woman he truly loves. :clap:

**OUCH**

Crickey Mo - I respect your right to an opinion but I am a little shocked - I thought everyone loved Diana - I'm not a royalist either & don't see the point in them
:)

if spitting image was still about the puppet would be better looking.....without a doubt:hihi: :hihi: :hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Originally posted by kirky
if spitting image was still about the puppet would be better looking.....without a doubt:hihi: :hihi: :hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

A pup off them two wouldn't be as nice looking as them Bulldog's of thine Kirky. :hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Originally posted by Mo
Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew hoe to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.

I am not a Royalist and would gladly pension the lot of them off tomorrow but Charles deserves to be happy and I am delighted that he is going to betrothed to the woman he truly loves. :clap:

Yes, Charles deserves to be happy, which is why I think he should hurry up and marry camilla and be done with it. As for Diana being an adultrous, good time girl, Wasn't it Charles who spent the night before their wedding with Camilla?!!

As for public acceptance of them, I think generally people will be fine with it, since it hasn't exactly come out of the blue...

Just let them get on with it!

Camilla showing her true colours.


http://www.madblast.com/funpages/view.cfm?id=8910

Originally posted by Mo


Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew hoe to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.



Sadly that does seem to be close to the mark Mo. Equally sad is that most of the general public are in denial and continue to subscribe to all the pathetic sentimentallity.

If the marriage is in April it's going to queer the pitch a little for all the electioneering that will be going on for a May election :D

But just another storm in a teacup really - who honestly cares what Charles does or doesn't do ?

Originally posted by beckyaa
Yes, Charles deserves to be happy,

Saying that though, if you look at this picture - Camilla also looks very happy.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/lestatt209/horseface.jpg

Originally posted by Mo
Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew how to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.
Well said Mo
Diana gets lots of undeserved sympathy because she was attractive, and the book industry and press made her out to be an angel and Charles to be the villan.
I'm sorry but journalists make up over half of what they print, and I have less sympathy for her than most people.
Although like everyone, I was shocked and upset by her death.

Moving on I am happy that Charles and Camilla are going to be allowed to live together properly from now on, and I think the sensitive way they have annouced that she is going to be the Dutchess of Cornwall and not Princess of Wales, is respectful to Diana's Memory, and Being the Princess Consort instead of Queen, will satisfy most of the public.

Good luck to them.

Originally posted by Lestat
Saying that though, if you look at this picture - Camilla also looks very happy.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/lestatt209/horseface.jpg

Ohhhh, leave the poor woman alone!! :roll: She can't help it, and if they are happy just let them be!

And I'd like to add, that people banging on about Camilla being ugly and people being unfaithful, should look at the plank of wood in their own eye before making a song and dance about the grain of sand on someone else's.

Originally posted by Lestat
Saying that though, if you look at this picture - Camilla also looks very happy.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/lestatt209/horseface.jpg


Nice one Lestat :thumbsup: it does show her better side though, we normally see this one

http://www.comus.tfcentral.com/horse1.jpg

and this one is allegedly on the bedroom door

http://www.heathershikinghiatus.homestead.com/files/horse_ass_sign.JPG

Originally posted by owdlad
Nice one Lestat :thumbsup: it does show her better side though, we normally see this one

http://www.comus.tfcentral.com/horse1.jpg

and this one is allegedly on the bedroom door

http://www.heathershikinghiatus.homestead.com/files/horse_ass_sign.JPG

So, so boring. :loopy:

Prince Charles finds an ancient wine bottle in the cellar of Windsor Castle. When he opens it a genie flys out and grants him a wish.
Charles is ecstatic as just that morning he had reversed his Range Rover over the Queen's favourite corgi and squashed it flat. He asks the genie to bring back the dog to life as the Queen would be furious and upset. The genie examines the dog which is splattered all over the drive and tells Charles that there is nothing he can do so he'd best chuck the dog in the dustbin.

Charles then asks the genie if he could make his girlfriend Cammilla Parker-Bowles beautiful as the media were always poking **** at her looks.

The genie thinks for a moment scratches his head and says "On second thoughts get that ******** dog out of the bin again"!!!

1. Who really cares who Charles marries?

2. Dianna was no saint and had affairs herself.

Originally posted by evildrneil
1. Who really cares who Charles marries?

Yeah, s'pose you're right . . . he's only going to be the future King of England - which will make old horseface the Queen.

Originally posted by evildrneil
1. Who really cares who Charles marries?

2. Dianna was no saint and had affairs herself.

I think a few on here are gently stroking their Diana Memorial Toby Mugs (c) as they post "jokes" about Camilla.

Nice hint of misogyny in some of 'em, too.

Well I'm up in the loft looking for the old and dusty Union Jack. I've ordered the claret and some fine wines from The Telegraph's wine service and am planning where to put the tent in the rear garden.

Tally ho, I say - good on you Charlie, congratulations Camilla. This fine and dandy country needs more things like this to celebrate. I'm going to borrow my late grandad's medals and play Elgar day in day out.

Can't wait. Do you think it'll be on TV, providing they move Eastenders on half an hour? I wonder if the sprog will be there: they are known not to be too keen in sharing baths with her (according to Camilla's website www.uglyasahorsebutyourrulersoshutitorillbeheadyou .co.uk.)

So William, it was really nothing! I wonder if Mercedez will sponsor the event? I bet that Richard Branson has a role to play. Maybe he'll lend them one of his planes, so they can honeymoon in Hades? (Keeper of the Faith, huh?!)

C'mon everyone, where's yer party spirit. Raise a glass!

I'm off to vomit now.

Originally posted by Greenback
I think a few on here are gently stroking their Diana Memorial Toby Mugs (c) as they post "jokes" about Camilla.

Nice hint of misogyny in some of 'em, too.

Neigh, Neigh, Neigh!! we dont hate women Greenback . . we are just animal lovers who want Charles & Camilla to ride off into the sunset happy.

Camilla

http://www.uglypeople.com/

Originally posted by Narcosis
So Charles to marry the women that destroyed Diana.


I hope they make prince william the next King. What will the world think putting a slapper (camilla) on the thrown as queen.

Easy tiger......

Diana did a pretty good job of destroying her self, and was a bit of a slapper herself.

Charles has the right to marry the women he loves and its not down to any one else to try and destroy the thing they have together.

Originally posted by Lestat
Yeah, s'pose you're right . . . he's only going to be the future King of England - which will make old horseface the Queen.

Wrong she's not going to be queen
See my previous post she's going to be Princess Consort

Originally posted by muddycoffee
Wrong she's not going to be queen
See my previous post she's going to be Princess Consort

So basically, deputy Queenie type person anyway?

Originally posted by Lestat
So basically, deputy Queenie type person anyway?
No no,
as irrelevant as Prince Philip the greek


http://www.rocknroll.f9.co.uk/advice/princephillipthegreek.html

who is worth his weight in , . . well, Feta Cheese !

1. Who really cares who Charles marries?

Only his sons really I'd have thought but however they feel about it it's still a family matter.

I know plenty of people who've had to get used to a new step parent in their lives - not many though who have to cope with the grief of losing a parent all the time knowing the world & his wife are debating the imperfections of their parents dead or alive :|

Originally posted by beckyaa
There's no way Charles will ever be on the throne anyway, it'll go straight to William, surely?
I can't see a single reason for im not to, unless he dies before his mother. :confused:

As for them getting married - look at it another way - they were in love from an early age, he was forced to marry someone he didn't love. She died tragically, and now he can marry his one true love.

Sounds like a lovely thing put like that. Wouldn't any of you like to have that second chance to be happy?

Originally posted by Tony
As for them getting married - look at it another way - they were in love from an early age, he was forced to marry someone he didn't love.

<<<


As Tony has missed out the rather important detail of Charles' affair, allow me to fill in the blanks.


>>>

Originally posted by Tony
She died tragically, and now he can marry his one true love.

Good for him.

He should have married her in the first place a very long time ago.

I think blaming either Charles or Diana for the break up of their marriage is daft, they were just not suited to each other.

Charles was forced to marry her against his will and she was just desperate to become a princess and live happily ever after.

Maybe Charles was slightly more in the wrong as regards his behaviour, but thats no reason to say that he shouldn't marry who he wants to now - or do you want to put him into exile because he wasn't very nice to his wife?

Originally posted by Abdul
As Tony has missed out the rather important detail of Charles' affair, allow me to fill in the blanks.


Hmm,
Affairs. Well obviously it wasn't as one sided as some people think. I'd like to remind people about Diana's fling with Hewitt. Prince Harry's Lookalike!

Originally posted by muddycoffee
Hmm,
Affairs. Well obviously it wasn't as one sided as some people think. I'd like to remind people about Diana's fling with Hewitt. Prince Harry's Lookalike!

Hmmm, you do wonder don't you.

All the royals inter married over the past centuries, how many other red heads are there?

You get red hair from Magyars (Hungarian and some parts of Scandinavia esp. Finland) and Celts. These groups of people are not big in European royal circles.

Originally posted by Yodameister
Maybe Charles was slightly more in the wrong... he wasn't very nice to his wife?

You do take a relaxed attitude to adultery over here, don't you?

Fine, let them get married. It'll please the 'old fashioned' types and those amongst us who believe that heads of state and those in the Monarchy should actually set an example to the Proletariat.

Just as long as they don't have any offspring <involuntary shudder>

Originally posted by muddycoffee
Hmm,
Affairs. Well obviously it wasn't as one sided as some people think. I'd like to remind people about Diana's fling with Hewitt. Prince Harry's Lookalike!

Yeah, but Charlie boy started it :P

He left a looker like Diana to shack up with an old trout. What a plonker :roll:

Charles the Future King? :gag:

Yes I really don't want to slander anybody on here because it's an interesting thread.
Queen Liz 1 was a ginger, but wasn't that a bit too long ago?
And how about Victoria?

Anyhow I should talk, Black hair, [when not bleached] and ginger bits in my beard. Daren't have any kids, might come out like one of those brown fresian cows!

Nice to see and hope Prince Charles will be happy and put the past behind him.

Camilla might have a face like a blind cobblers left thumb, but also she might have a heart of gold.

Dont judge by appearances.

Once on a television interview with Debbie Mcgee:

Debbie, what first attracted you to MULTI - MILLIONARE Paul Daniels

Originally posted by Abdul
He left a looker like Diana to shack up with an old trout. What a plonker :roll:


Sos Abdul, But there's many lookers I've turned down who are as miserable as sin. To have a great time with a plain woman.

How many times have you heard,
"she'd have looked a whole lot prettier if she'd let out a smile once in a while"

Ugly girl who's a good cook does it for me every time..:thumbsup:

Isnt it about time the queen resigned and let charlie have a pop at the title.

I don't know if this marks me out as some sort of freak, but I never found Diana particularly attractive.

Anyway, what I was saying before was not that adultery was not wrong, but that I didn't think it should mean he should not be allowed to marry again, after all, that does not apply to the rest us.

I agree that as the royals get all that money then you could suggest they should behave better, but by that argument then maybe we should put anyoone who can prove themselves to be a paragon of virtue on the civil list?

The roayls didn't get where they are be being nice, they got there by their ancestors killing a lot of people.

Also,
if the queen lets Charlie have a little turn, will they have to rename things like :
Queens park rangers, to Charlie park rangers?

All the pubs called queens head to: Charlies noggin?

Originally posted by owdlad THOUGHT YOU WERE BEING SERIOUS THEN OWDLAD,
I think that comment is so nasty and uncalled for. You should retract that statement forthwith and be ashamed of yourself for even thinking it let alone having the temerity to put it on an open forum such as this RETRACT IT AT ONCE !















MY Rotty is distraught at being compared to that horse faced Moo :P :P :P :P

Originally posted by jonsastar
Isnt it about time the queen resigned and let charlie have a pop at the title.

I don't think Her Majesty would resign until Charles got married... so it may turn out that way in the near future.

Originally posted by Abdul
I don't think Her Majesty would resign until Charles got married... so it may turn out that way in the near future.

Doesn't this mean that they have to retract some legislation that says that the heir to the throne can't marry a catholic or the monarch can't be married to a catholic?

Couldn't wait to get up this morning to read what you all had to say after seing it on CNN at 8AM, i agree with all of you, no love lost for Di, she was a runaround after all, also who cares if Chas gets married or not, dosen't effect me one bit.

Originally posted by Yodameister
Doesn't this mean that they have to retract some legislation that says that the heir to the throne can't marry a catholic or the monarch can't be married to a catholic?

I wouldn't worry too much about that.

Don't forget - Henry VIII adjusted the law to suit himself... in strangely similar circumstances too!

It is bad news indeed.

I haven't felt this low about things since that seagull **** in my left ear on Cleethorpes beach back in 1991.

Originally posted by Abdul
I wouldn't worry too much about that.

Don't forget - Henry VIII adjusted the law to suit himself... in strangely similar circumstances too!

If they had to pass some legislation though, there could be some loony MPs and Lords who would kick up a fuss about it.

They wouldn't stop it happening, but it might be entertaining.

Originally posted by Yodameister
If they had to pass some legislation though, there could be some loony MPs and Lords who would kick up a fuss about it.

They wouldn't stop it happening, but it might be entertaining.

Bring it on then, Bring it on :clap:

Seriously though, would anybody really if she is a Catholic or not?

Originally posted by Yodameister
I don't know if this marks me out as some sort of freak, but I never found Diana particularly attractive.


You're not alone Yodameister, She never floated my boat either. Always struck me as having a slightly bovine look about her.- Not a minger as such, more of a borderline boiler.

She's a proper mirror-cracker she is.

I bet she can fight 'anall.

Originally posted by Sam Miguel
She's a proper mirror-cracker she is.

I bet she can fight 'anall.

I bet she's still a goodun for the lads though ;)

Originally posted by owdlad
I bet she's still a goodun for the lads though ;)

As a sparring partner? ;)

Originally posted by Abdul
I don't think Her Majesty would resign until Charles got married... so it may turn out that way in the near future.
I have a theory that Liz is trying to out-do Victoria, so she'll not step down until at least 1952+63=2015

Originally posted by Narcosis
So Charles to marry the women that destroyed Diana.


I hope they make prince william the next King. What will the world think putting a slapper (camilla) on the thrown as queen. agree agree agree . im putting my royal head on - god bless diana

Originally posted by Lestat
Yeah, s'pose you're right . . . he's only going to be the future King of England - which will make old horseface the Queen.

Don't you EVER say another word about people judging Michael Jackson on his looks being shallow!

How dare you be self righteous about people being shallow whilst calling someone "horseface".

The only reason that they're "shallow" when it's Michael Jackson is because he's your favourite "pop star".

Oh, and PS, Michael Jackson DOES look weird. There's no denying that.

There is something bothering me with suggestions that William should become King before Charles.

WHY?

We don't know a single thing about him. I wouldn't even recognise his voice. I don't know if he is a raging fascist or a tree hugger. What on earth qualifies such a young inexperienced man to be a king before his father?

..........don't give a jot!

Janey.

So Charlie's gonna marry his old pony eh?








eeor - eeor - eeorto know better :hihi:

Originally posted by Tony
There is something bothering me with suggestions that William should become King before Charles.

WHY?

We don't know a single thing about him. I wouldn't even recognise his voice. I don't know if he is a raging fascist or a tree hugger. What on earth qualifies such a young inexperienced man to be a king before his father?

And since when has it been down to public opinion to decide who is King or Queen? The next one in line automatically becomes Heir when their parent has died.

People have heard about "this thing called abdication" and think it's an option.

Im with the 'Diana was minging' gang. And really, why do some people feel so strongly about Charles marrying Camilla?? There nobodies arent they? Im sure they all really nice people but ffs, this is the 21st Century......

Get over it.....

Oh and Diana was a manipulating, devious bint who quite ironically was killed pretty much by the same people who brought her 'life'.

Originally posted by Tony
There is something bothering me with suggestions that William should become King before Charles.

WHY?

We don't know a single thing about him. I wouldn't even recognise his voice. I don't know if he is a raging fascist or a tree hugger. What on earth qualifies such a young inexperienced man to be a king before his father?

I think the top and bottom of it is that Wills is a bit of a looker, and definitely much more than Charlie.

Oh, and he looks a bit like the 'queen of hearts' :gag:

I just came across this poem Charlie has supposedly sent to his new love

I thought that I could love no other
Until, that is, I met your brother

I want to feel your sweet embrace
But don't take that paper bag off of your face

My darling, my lover, my beautiful wife:
Marrying you has screwed up my life

My love, you take my breath away
What have you stepped in to smell this way?

I see your face when I am dreaming
and that is why I wake up screaming.

The old romantic

:hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

I don't care if they marry or not - I think everyone deserves a chance of happiness.

It's not as though the current Queen has much of a say in how the country is run. I know she needs to agree to all new laws etc, but the last monarch to disagree was hundreds of years ago.

I don't think it makes that much difference!

K x

Diana had affairs because she knew about Charles and horse-face, it was horse-face's fault they dint marry all those years ago cause she would'nt wait for him when he joined the Navy, she went and married Parker-bowles! I know she wont be known as queen but she's still married to a king! She will still have the title HRH, which is too good for her. Charles should abdicate like Edward HAD too if he marries trout gob!

Originally posted by owdlad
I just came across this poem Charlie has supposedly sent to his new love

I thought that I could love no other
Until, that is, I met your brother

I want to feel your sweet embrace
But don't take that paper bag off of your face

My darling, my lover, my beautiful wife:
Marrying you has screwed up my life

My love, you take my breath away
What have you stepped in to smell this way?

I see your face when I am dreaming
and that is why I wake up screaming.

The old romantic

:hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

PMSL!!!:P Excellent ha ha ha!! I bet Charles is going to think he's been attacked by the mafia when he wakes up next to a horses head!!:hihi:

At the end of the day it's his life.

I have no problems with him getting married again, if he is happy why shouldn't he.

Though i do think as head of the Church of England when he becomes King it doesnt look good. Another nail in the coffin for them i think.

im not bothered what he gets up too,but why put a picture of diana at the same time as his engagement?the mind boggles,its like inviting your ex to your wedding :confused:

Perhaps we could have a forum whip-round? We might get enough for a toaster. :P

You should all be very happy their marrying each other, this way their saving two other people !

Originally posted by Yodameister
I don't know if this marks me out as some sort of freak, but I never found Diana particularly attractive.


Originally posted by Swan_Vesta
She never floated my boat either. Always struck me as having a slightly bovine look about her.- Not a minger as such, more of a borderline boiler.


Originally posted by mat1978
Im with the 'Diana was minging' gang.


Bit out of your league, was she boys?

Just been listening to Hallam FM talking about the Wedding coming up between Camilla & Charles… They’re calling Camilla a Chinchilla :o There’s me thinking Chinchilla’s were cute! :huh: hmmm… confused!

I am definitely no royalist but… I did like Diana I thought she was a lovely person… she’d finally found a new happiness & love that was so tragically short lived… I was very shocked to hear of her death…

As for Camilla & Charles getting married I couldn’t really give a damn as it doesn’t effect my life so let em get on with it... but one thing I will agree on tho is that no way should Charles be King… I don’t feel he has done anything to deserve such a privilege (if that’s what you can call it) :hihi:

I feel William should definitely be the next in line… an that I should become his Duchess! :wink: :clap: :hihi: :hihi:




ps The thought of Harry not being Charles' son had never crossed my mind but... hmmmm now i've got to thinking... Red hair does look a little out of place... tut!tut! Hewitt :nono: :lol:

Originally posted by Angel05
I am definitely no royalist but… I did like Diana I thought she was a lovely person… she’d finally found a new happiness & love that was so tragically short lived… I was very shocked to hear of her death…

I agree with that statement. Diana did a lot of charity work, and broke social taboos to ensure that the sick and dying weren't treated like social outcasts.

Would any of those who criticise Diana's integrity have cradled children dying of cancer, or those stricken with AIDS? I know I wouldn't.

I'll not question the integrity of anyone who brings the smallest measure of comfort to the dying or afflicted but I will state that I consider it the royal family's duty bring attention and aid to those less fortunate.

If they're going to get the pampered lifestyle that they get paid for by thee and me then using their status to work on behalf of people in need is a prerequisite for their existance.

By aiding charities and individuals in need they are doing only what is expected of them, if they were to exceed themselves in their efforts then I would possibly view them more favourably.

Exactly Swan_Vesta.

And did any Royal do that better than Diana?

In fact, has any Royal done it since?

Compare her to the Duchess of York, who spent more time on overseas holidays than raising her own daughters, and you'll see the gulf between them.

The Duchess of York - now there's a minger.

Who cares??

We all should, we're paying for them to live royally.
:mad:

Originally posted by Abdul
Exactly Swan_Vesta.

And did any Royal do that better than Diana?

In fact, has any Royal done it since?

Compare her to the Duchess of York, who spent more time on overseas holidays than raising her own daughters, and you'll see the gulf between them.

The Duchess of York - now there's a minger.

Abdul, I can hear the sound of a nail being hit frimly on the head. Not one of the royals can match her for patronage to a worthy cause.

My opinions of Diana's attractiveness aside, she did give the rest of the idle beggars something to aspire to. They should spend less time commadeering choppers to whisk them to golf matches and more time doing their duty.

When faced with the option to either raise the profile of the needy or to ponce yet more cash off the public, your average royal will usually go for option B.

And I agree with you again, the Duchess of York does ming.

Originally posted by Abdul
The Duchess of York - now there's a minger.

Careful Abdul, you're no oil painting either

Originally posted by Abdul


The Duchess of York - now there's a minger.


oh come on you lot - I bet you're all so gorgeous yourselves, not lol ... i've seen many denigrating comments about women on this Forum, but this thread has been the worst ... this isn't specifically targeted at you Abdul, you have a great smile ... but we all get so worked up about the openly racist comments by people like craigmason and royjames etc and yet people make derogatory comments about women and hardly anyone even raises an eyebrow.

I was thinking we could have an awards ceremony The Sheffield Forum Easter Awards for ... (insert category here - some suggestions ....)

Most Racist :O
Most Sexist :/
Hottest :P
Funniest :D
Saddest :(

I'm sure others can think of other categories they'd like to nominate for .... I already have a little list ... :D

Originally posted by mojoworking
Careful Abdul, you're no oil painting either

My larger-than-average private parts more than compensate.

I was thinking about this when I saw a few photos of her in her younger days. TBH she's not ugly there, so I thought "what's changed?"

So I looked at the next recent pics that came up of her and came to the conclusion that with a makeover and expecially a more modern haircut she would look quite nice!

Maybe we will see one sometime soon?

I havent read all the threads here so not sure what everyones opinion is. However, my own opinion is that I dont really care! All of the polls of the last day or so have had do we approve, yes or no, there really should be another option for dont care. Its not something which is going to interfere with my life or have an significant change to me or effect my life in any way shape or form, so really I dont care and im sure that millions of other people out there would have the same stance.

I think its shocking that the queen, prime minister, archbishops and various other people have been consulted and have to approve of it. Hes a man, if he wants to re-marry then so be it, it happens to thousands of people in this country and I dont think its a big deal.

In my opinion the more people realise that the Royal Family are just the same as us, and the more they are allowed to behave the same way as us, the better.

I've never heard it suggested about average people that they should not be allowed to get married again because they commited adultery.

Another point that noone seems to have mentioned that hwo can the fact he is divorced be a bar to his marriage receiving the blessing of the church, when his former wife is dead - surely that means that their marriage is over in the eyes of the church anyway?

Originally posted by Tony
I was thinking about this when I saw a few photos of her in her younger days. TBH she's not ugly there, so I thought "what's changed?"

So I looked at the next recent pics that came up of her and came to the conclusion that with a makeover and expecially a more modern haircut she would look quite nice!

Maybe we will see one sometime soon?

But the woman has got a face like a ferret's bottom! She really has!

Originally posted by Mo
Duh yourself! She was an adult. She got into a car being driven by and man who had suposededly been drinking and may I remind you she WAS NOT wearing a seatbelt. The only person in the car wearing a seatbelt survived.

Sorry she was an adultrous, good-time girl who knew hoe to manipulate the media to perfection and could perform to camera better than any trained actress.

She was pathetically shallow and should never have been allowed to marry Prince Charles.

I am not a Royalist and would gladly pension the lot of them off tomorrow but Charles deserves to be happy and I am delighted that he is going to betrothed to the woman he truly loves. :clap:

That is the best post I have ever seen you write. I agree completely.

What I do not understand is what on earth relevence Diana has to whether Charles should get married again or not.

Is he suppose to serve pennitence for the rest of his life because his first marriage not working out, even if it was mainly his fault (I'm not saying this was the case,I really don't know enough about it to say either way)

Originally posted by Abdul
I don't think Her Majesty would resign until Charles got married... so it may turn out that way in the near future.

Lets hope so as she seems to have gone a bit stale recently, Charles may not be the ideal soveriegn but at least he is from this era, and probably is closer to the bone than the queen.

Apparently Charles and Camilla have had to rearrange the date for their wedding as it falls on the same date as Crufts. ;)

Originally posted by Abdul
My larger-than-average private parts more than compensate.

How many rooms are there in your house then Abdul ? ;)

Originally posted by Pauly
Apparently Charles and Camilla have had to rearrange the date for their wedding as it falls on the same date as Crufts. ;)

no no no no no


NO

Originally posted by Pauly
Apparently Charles and Camilla have had to rearrange the date for their wedding as it falls on the same date as Crufts. ;)

Your barking mad mate :loopy:

Why all the fuss about this marriage anyway ? Who cares ? :huh:

Why is the fact that charles and camilla are getting married so important? who cares about em!!! I agree that william should be king not that prick charles and his wife to be, horseface!!!
I don't think many people will be watching this marriage on tv!!! LOL

Come on - why slate Dianna? She was really young when she married Charles and she was probably very naive. She did her bit and produced 2 sons.

Charles, in my opinion, used her and then made it perfectly clear he no longer had any use for her once she'd produced two sons.

Of course she learned how to use the press - come on, she was never left alone by them so she did exactly what most of us would have done in her situation. He went off and had an affair with Camilla before Dianna went off to find some affection - we all need affection. The trouble is, 'they' were never going to let her get away with it and disclosed the tapes when it was convenient to do so. The tapes were made by MI5 and not by some radio ham hacking into the conversation. All mobile phone conversations made by any member of the royal family and senior Government officials are taped as a matter of course - just in case someone tries to blackmail them.

Obviously most conversations do not get revealed to the press - unless it suits some other purpose.

Who Charles marries now is of no interest to me. He should have respected his wife more when she was alive. I have no respect for him and Camilla is a total irrelevance.

Charles will be King (if he outlives the Queen) because that is the way the monarchy passes on - it would take quite a dramatic change to make William King and bypass Charles. Charles could of course, be king and then abdicate the same day and thus pass the throne directly to William but that's unlikely to happen at the moment. Maybe in 10 or 20 years he might do so. Charles obviously loves his sons and would not 'burden' William with being King at such a young age.

Gosh, I must care more than I think to write all this cr*p?!

Originally posted by owdlad
How many rooms are there in your house then Abdul ? ;)

Walk south for a fortnight, then head east for three days...and I'll meet you in the living room (old texas joke)

I've just had a thought...

If they get married will we get an extra bank holiday?!

If we do then I'm all for it!!! :partyhat:

Just been thinking about all these comments from everywhere about Camilla's looks.

Anybody ever studied a close up of Charlie? Hunk, ain't he?!!

And there's an old saying...... "Marry an ugly bird, and find comfort in the knowledge that no one will try to nick her off you."

Originally posted by Hels
........ The tapes were made by MI5 and not by some radio ham hacking into the conversation. All mobile phone conversations made by any member of the royal family and senior Government officials are taped as a matter of course - just in case someone tries to blackmail them.

Obviously most conversations do not get revealed to the press - unless it suits some other purpose........



They televised those phone calls tonight on the 6pm news:

Camilla: " I want you so much. I love you darling"
Charles: "I want you too, all of the time"
Camilla: " Call me in the morning when you wake up"........

It went on and on like that. YUK.:gag: It just sounds so ridiculous in that snooty sloany voice. They deserve each other. England doesn't! He should never have married Diana. She was too good for him.

I don't mind if she becomes queen, i quite like her.

Did your country really care about Diana? I felt sad for her since apparently Charles never loved her and preferred the (sorry about this description) horse-faced, ratherly manly Camella (spelling ?).

The oddest thing was when Diana died it affected me so intensely. I don't know why...I never really followed her life in the media nor thought about her at all. However, I felt a deep sense of loss; it was really weird and I cried for days! In fact, there were many Americans who stated they felt a real loss when she died.

Oh dear !!!!!!! :gag: Fly the flag etc....


BTW she will never be Queenie, I think I posted before that hopefully Charles wont take the throne either.

Originally posted by Freedom_USA
Did your country really care about Diana? I felt sad for her since apparently Charles never loved her and preferred the (sorry about this description) horse-faced, ratherly manly Camella (spelling ?).

The oddest thing was when Diana died it affected me so intensely. I don't know why...I never really followed her life in the media nor thought about her at all. However, I felt a deep sense of loss; it was really weird and I cried for days! In fact, there were many Americans who stated they felt a real loss when she died.
Of course our country cared about her and her death. She was the most photogaphed woman in the world, she was ours, and the pictures of her funeral were evidence of how much the country cared.
But that was nearly 8 years ago. A different century!

If Charles wants to marry another woman, what does it matter if she isn't as good looking?
What do you want him to do, wear a black armband for the rest of his days?

I think like most people we felt for her boys more than her.

Originally posted by muddycoffee
Of course our country cared about her and her death. She was the most photogaphed woman in the world, she was ours, and the pictures of her funeral were evidence of how much the country cared.
But that was nearly 8 years ago. A different century!

If Charles wants to marry another woman, what does it matter if she isn't as good looking?
What do you want him to do, wear a black armband for the rest of his days?


Well, I certainly thought so--the outpouring of grief for her was huge. The reason that I asked is because I was in a Forum in the U.S. and some guy (who claimed that he had lived in England for some time) said that the Brits did not care about her at all--which really surprised me.

Originally posted by Freedom_USA
Well, I certainly thought so--the outpouring of grief for her was huge. The reason that I asked is because I was in a Forum in the U.S. and some guy (who claimed that he had lived in England for some time) said that the Brits did not care about her at all--which really surprised me.

I was in the UK onthe day she died,i didn't think much of her myself as a person but i do think the Brits could have held off on the jokes about her death for a couple more days, the day after i was on the train going back to Sheffield, some guy stood up and entertained everyone with his sick jokes, i didn't see anyone complain or shed a tear for her then.

I heard a really bad joke on the radio today... I was listening online to my old fav local Radio station from dahn sarf! :hihi:

Hmmm here goes...

The queen has bought Camilla an early wedding present... 'A trip to Paris... in a Mercedes' :shocked:

Probably all heard it before... never mind :P... i'm always behind in the times... (an 'no' i dont mean the back page :wink: ) :hihi: :clap: