Tony_BLiar
20-01-2005, 13:57
Do you think its right that this ****** has been allowed out of prison to go to his dad's funeral? I think that he should have been executed years ago....
|
View Full Version : Ripper being let out of prison for funeral Tony_BLiar 20-01-2005, 13:57 Do you think its right that this ****** has been allowed out of prison to go to his dad's funeral? I think that he should have been executed years ago.... MuteWitness 20-01-2005, 14:01 he hasnt, i thought he had just been allowed to see where the ashes are scatterd screamingwitch 20-01-2005, 14:02 Originally posted by Tony_BLiar Do you think its right that this ****** has been allowed out of prison to go to his dad's funeral? I think that he should have been executed years ago.... read this (http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/preface.htm) ive had a long chats with noel on usenet...hes even managing to convince one of the victims sons that the rREAL rippers still at lage SW Siān 20-01-2005, 23:46 hes even managing to convince one of the victims sons that the rREAL rippers still at lage Psychopaths are incredibly manipulative by nature - sends shivers down your spine though that he's managed to convince a victim's son of this kilauea 20-01-2005, 23:55 I don't see what difference it makes to anybody. he get escorted out of prison, see's a patch of earth, goes back to permanent inprisonment. So what? craigb 21-01-2005, 12:36 As horrible as the things he did may be, he is still human and still has the right to mourne the loss of his father like anyone else would. I don't see what the fuss is about personally - it's not like they just opened the door and said "and be back before supper" is it?! t020 21-01-2005, 14:02 Originally posted by kilauea I don't see what difference it makes to anybody. he get escorted out of prison, see's a patch of earth, goes back to permanent inprisonment. So what? So he's supposed to be in prison. He's a serial rapist and murderer, why should he be allowed out for a day to visit the place his father's ashes were scattered? He lost that right the moment he killed his first victim. Imagine how the victims families felt about this. Don_Kiddick 21-01-2005, 14:08 I bet this kicks off the hanging debate again :thumbsup: It's already alive & well on here www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?s=&postid=267532#post267532 [Don sits back to watch]. Nope, Suttie is evil personified & should not have been let out to see anything. - even with 1 eye ;) Human+Escorts does not = Correct. Soz But thats it. N E X T . . . Don_Kiddick 21-01-2005, 14:21 Check this snippet out http://watchtower.observer.org/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041226/JWANDSOCIETY2/41226007 Lickszz 21-01-2005, 21:48 Originally posted by screamingwitch read this (http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/preface.htm) ive had a long chats with noel on usenet...hes even managing to convince one of the victims sons that the rREAL rippers still at lage SW Does that mean that Sutcliffe should be released on some sort of technicality? Siān 21-01-2005, 23:11 So he's supposed to be in prison Not wishing to be pedantic (:P) but he's actually in Broadmoor psychiatric unit - not prison. Does that mean that Sutcliffe should be released on some sort of technicality? I heard something on the news about a fear he may be released ( as a result of appeals & being denied basic human rights or something) if the powers that be at Broadmoor fail to address his needs etc etc. LBoogie 22-01-2005, 05:07 I don't have a problem with him being let out to see where his father was buried/or go to his funeral. He will be under police protection and will probably be handcuffed throughout. Despite the terrible terrible things he did he still has the same rights to mourn as every other human being does. LottieWat 22-01-2005, 09:38 A spokesperson for the Home Office said that if they had denied his request to visit the spot where his father's ashes were spread then he would have had grounds to sue them for infringement of his human rights. Rights which he has regardless of his crimes. I can see how this must infuriate the victims' families and I feel for them but the Home Office had to allow him to go and I imagine the procedure was secret so as not to cause these families any further torment. Am I right in thinking that the media found out and are trying to whip up a storm about it? Don_Kiddick 22-01-2005, 09:53 Originally posted by LottieWat Am I right in thinking that the media found out and are trying to whip up a storm about it? More than likely LW! But... (IMO) - LBoogie's gonna wet themselves at this I'm sure but If they'd have hanged Suttie from the start............ (Don takes cover) :D:o LBoogie 22-01-2005, 09:59 boom boom *claps* t020 22-01-2005, 11:57 Originally posted by LBoogie I don't have a problem with him being let out to see where his father was buried/or go to his funeral. He will be under police protection and will probably be handcuffed throughout. Despite the terrible terrible things he did he still has the same rights to mourn as every other human being does. He can mourn from within his prison cell. He does not have the same rights as most other humans (i.e. the right to freedom) - that's the WHOLE POINT of being imprisoned. LBoogie 22-01-2005, 12:41 I never said he had the right to freedom. He has the right to be escorted out, with guards, in handcuffs, to see his father's grave... Siān 22-01-2005, 12:51 I imagine the procedure was secret so as not to cause these families any further torment. I think the secrecy had more to do with the security issues that surrounded the whole thing. in handcuffs, to see his father's grave... According to the news he was allowed half an hour's "quiet contemplation" alone but with prison officers watching from nearby. LBoogie 22-01-2005, 12:59 Well, I think that's fine still... kilauea 22-01-2005, 13:58 Originally posted by t020 So he's supposed to be in prison. He's a serial rapist and murderer, why should he be allowed out for a day to visit the place his father's ashes were scattered? He lost that right the moment he killed his first victim. Imagine how the victims families felt about this. I don't give a **** about the victims families, or Sutcliffe. Its all yesterdays news - a bad man did some bad things some years ago and is now locked up. Why do people jump on these things and pretend they actualy care? t020 22-01-2005, 20:24 Originally posted by kilauea I don't give a **** about the victims families, or Sutcliffe. Its all yesterdays news - a bad man did some bad things some years ago and is now locked up. Why do people jump on these things and pretend they actualy care? Perhaps they do care, empathetically? t020 22-01-2005, 20:25 Originally posted by LBoogie I never said he had the right to freedom. He has the right to be escorted out, with guards, in handcuffs, to see his father's grave... No he doesn't, or shouldn't have. Someone who has committed the crimes that he has should never see the light of day. |