Here is a test to see which of the two women posted men on here find most physically attractive. This is purley about looks (which are of course only skin deep) and nothing else is implied.

Picture 1 - http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/04/12/andreadworkin_narrowweb__200x266.jpg


Picture 2 - http://opkenkeren.com/vootoos/NikkiSanderson.jpg

Your crazy slimsid :?:?:?

So which would you choose?

which would you choose?:)

which would you choose?:)

Picture 2 I have already voted.

which would you choose?:)

More to the point, which is he more likely to pull ?

More to the point, which is he more likely to pull ?


Obviously Nikki Sanderson because I believe Andrea Dworkin died a few years back.

Obviously Nikki Sanderson because I believe Andrea Dworkin died a few years back.

Think you might have more chance with Andrea Dworkin then? :)

I believe Andrea Dworkin died a few years back.

any port in a storm, you're just being picky now.

Obviously Nikki Sanderson because I believe Andrea Dworkin died a few years back.
Sid, with your degree of success with the ladies, you might want to give necrophilia some serious consideration :hihi: .

Sanderson looks like she's got a snout instead of a nose in that picture.

I still would though.

Sid, with your degree of success with the ladies, you might want to give necrophilia some serious consideration :hihi: .

Slimsid the next Carl Tanzler????? :o:o:o

Sid, with your degree of success with the ladies, you might want to give necrophilia some serious consideration :hihi: .


Don't give him any ideas, for goodness' sake! :hihi:

StarSparkle

i've never considered whether i find women attractive , is there sommat wrong wi me?

i've never considered whether i find women attractive , is there sommat wrong wi me?

Its so 1980 not to have lesbian tendencies :(

More to the point WHY is this poll here? What's the sinister nature behind it? I think we have a right to know.

More to the point WHY is this poll here? What's the sinister nature behind it? I think we have a right to know.


Nothing sinister at all. It is intended to see if there is general agreement (or not) amongst men as to which women they find more attractive.

Of course a true feminist (and of course men can be feninists too) would say they found both equally attractive as looks should not even be an issue and anyway a 'new man' just would not even notice what a woman looked like.

twaddle.

Slimsid, what do you know of feminism? Other than it must be to blame for something?

I'm not gay but the prospect of doing a dirt with Dave 'cheap as chips' Dickinson is too good to ignore.

Are there really no men out there who fancy Andrea more (or even as much as) Nikki. Come on.

Slimsid, what do you know of feminism?

It's his latest "reason" for not getting any

edit your poll; where's the other choice??
the ones you ask for us to choose from are as ugly as each other!
A true english rose
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MMPH/264444~Kate-Winslet-Posters.jpg

I'm not gay but the prospect of doing a dirt with Dave 'cheap as chips' Dickinson is too good to ignore.

I thought that was him! He's the smarmy Bargain Hunters (Treasure Hunters? Or summat?) guy with the long hair! I don't want to sleep with him -- but I could really kick some a*se on that show! The contestants are idiots.

What has happened to all the 'new men' in this feminist age?

I thought we were all now not the least interested in what a woman looks like and indeed were physically incapable of even noticing if a woman (I dare not say girl) is 'conventionally attractive' (whatever that is) or not.

Why has nobody voted for option 3 which is in effect that they are equally attractive and you can barley tell the difference between them.?

Leave poor Andrea alone, she had a tough and horrible life.

What has happened to all the 'new men' in this feminist age?

I thought we were all now not the least interested in what a woman looks like and indeed were physically incapable of even noticing if a woman (I dare not say girl) is 'conventionally attractive' (whatever that is) or not.

Why has nobody voted for option 3 which is in effect that they are equally attractive and you can barley tell the difference between them.?

Maybe it's because you clearly stated that it was based on looks alone, and it is quite obvious to everybody that one of those women is more attractive than the other. It is in our nature to find certain things attractive, we can't help that.

You didn't ask if we would ever find either of them attractive if we got to know them, or if we could love either of them equally. Why would you be surprised at the result?

A better test would be to put a picture of you up and see if any women would be willing to sleep with you.

Slim.... are you for real? I cannot work you out... this unlucky with the females thing is either an online persona you have created and you aren't really that way or your it really is a reflection of your true personality. The reason I say this, I never met anyone who has had so much bad luck with women and doesn't mind being wound up about it :confused:

What has happened to all the 'new men' in this feminist age?

I thought we were all now not the least interested in what a woman looks like and indeed were physically incapable of even noticing if a woman (I dare not say girl) is 'conventionally attractive' (whatever that is) or not.

Why has nobody voted for option 3 which is in effect that they are equally attractive and you can barley tell the difference between them.?

this is a classic case of asking a question that the asker has defined in a different way, to delibrately undermine the responses.

When you post a picture, and ask how attractive it is, you are objectifying the item, and requesting that people judge how that thing looks.

you cannot then critique the responses by saying that the quality of 'attractiveness' has more to it than being visually pleasing.

in other words, you cannot fairly redefine how you are asking the question without informing others first.

you may as well criticise people for not wondering how magnetic each of the people are...as there is a scientific link between the notion of 'attractiveness' and 'magnetism'.

Can you see? In order to gain a fruitful response from a question there has to be a shared understanding of what the question actually means...otherwise it is a pointless question.