View Full Version : Miniture Wireless Tracking and DNA database will Deter Violent Crime


russellhanab
23-10-2004, 20:44
QUESTION #1

Would violent criminals attack if they knew they would be quickly identified and punished?


A new invention creates evident against the attacker that can be located wirelessly and identifies him by DNA. This invention creates a new industry for Identifying Security Products (ISP). The ISP will reduce violent crimes like assault, abduction, rape, and murder worldwide. The ISP website is

www.adaisi.com


THE CONCEPT IS SIMPLE

The ISP combines DNA identification with the detection capability of Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) tags. RFID is a wireless technology that enables the wireless detection objects. An RFID tag can be the size a grain of rice or sand.

A potential victim wears a button sized capsule of RFID tags. Imagine a pill holding a hundred minature RFID tags. Each RFID tag has little barbs which sample and hold skin (DNA) from the attacker. When the attacker strikes the struggle of the attack ruptures the capsule and scatters these DNA samplers over him. Some of them will sample the attacker’s skin and then scatter on to the ground.


POLICE SEARCH

Each enclosure has a unique RFID code which all of the tags share. A police set their wireless RFID search devices for the victim’s unique code. All other RFID codes are ignored. Once a DNA sampler is recovered it is taken to a DNA lab to extract the DNA and identify the attacker.

The threat of DNA identification could intimate an attacker from striking in the first place. If the attacker is not deterred by the tissue samplers and RFID tags, then ISP evidence will get him incarcerated.


INTEGRATED ISP DETECTION NETWORK (IIDN)

An integrated RFID tag detection network would make the ISP even more powerful.


1.) Long range passive RFID tags with internal antenna are coming see:

http://www.discover.pitt.edu/media/pcc031006/sci1_PENITag.html


2.) Mobile phones will soon have integrated RFID detectors:

A web search for ‘mobile + phone + rfid’ will yield much on this.


Imagine an integrated network of mobile phones/RFID detectors searching for the victim’s unique RFID code. The attacker would have little hope of avoiding identification. His person would be contaminated with long range RFID tags. Other tags would be scattered about the crime scene holding is DNA.

The IIDN would broadcast of the victim’s unique RFID code to all networked RFID detectors. This could locate the victim’s RFID tags quickly. This makes the live recovery of kidnap victims a real possibility. From the moment of tissue sampling the hunt for the attacker begins.


THE NEED

The U.S.A. alone has over 5.7 million violent crimes. + 80,000 rapes, +4.8 million assaults, +30,000 stranger abductions, about 100 child abduction murders every year.


WORLDWIDE VIOLENT CRIME DETERRENT

The ISP is a low cost deterrent to violent crime for the world. The ISP is both powerful and very low cost.


POWERFUL

The ISP provides evidence for direct physical contact between the victim and the attacker. It requires no training, strength, nor agility. The ISP is effective against attackers regardless of their strength or number.


LOW COST

The Cost-Of-Goods could be as low as $0.5 depending on features. It requires neither maintenance nor a service organization. It is small and flexible. It can be incorporated into daily wear items like buttons or jewelry.


QUESTION #2:

Would there be violent criminals if people wore ISPs?


For more information on the new industry of ISP including animation see

www.adaisi.com

Russell Hanabusa
ISP Inventor

evildrneil
23-10-2004, 20:48
Are you trying to put this forward as a good thing?

DerekH
23-10-2004, 20:57
It is nice to think that we are coming out with more technology to combat crime.
However...combating crime and getting a result are two different avenues.
The CPS are hell bent on giving the soft approach that criminals like........no matter what you put in place to catch the criminal.....there will be something there as a reward for their efforts.

Tracking etc will not work as seen with the ankle bracelet The crimes were still committed with the contraption in operation

Anything that brings results is welcome but untill the CPS etc is sorted out......Nothing will work to stop crime

JoeP
23-10-2004, 21:16
Interesting.....

However, doesn't this infer the collection of DNA samples form the population in general to get a database to compare the samples against?

Also, it might suggest to an attacker - let's say a mugger - that the safest way to deal with their target might be to shoot them with a handgun or even something like a taser so that a physical struggle doesn't take place. Of course, in robbing the body there is the chance that the tags would still be dispersed.

But an intersting idea though!

Joe

John
23-10-2004, 21:33
I don't mind my DNA being on a database however, I do mind RFID tags.

There are plans to put RFID tags in money to prevent fraud but the problem I have with that is muggers could have detector counting how much a person is carrying before deciding whether a victim is worth mugging or not.

andy1702
24-10-2004, 01:38
I'm amazed this has only just surfaced for discussion. In truth many of us are already unknowingly carrying small radio transmitters which enable anyone with the right equipment to locate us to within a few metres. They are called mobile telephones.

And the equipment to locate someone? Well, last time I looked, they were selling it in Meadowhall!!!!

russellhanab
24-10-2004, 04:31
Mobile phones with RFID capability?

http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,55738,00.html

Russell Hanabusa
ISP Inventor
www.adaisi.com

JoeP
24-10-2004, 08:06
Originally posted by andy1702
I'm amazed this has only just surfaced for discussion. In truth many of us are already unknowingly carrying small radio transmitters which enable anyone with the right equipment to locate us to within a few metres. They are called mobile telephones.

And the equipment to locate someone? Well, last time I looked, they were selling it in Meadowhall!!!!

There's a lot of difference between a mobile phone and an RFID tag. I can turn my mobile off and it's as much use as a tracking device as a chocolate teapot, unless it's been bugged or tagged.

RFIDs are 'always on'.

Also, getting the location of a obile phone down to within a few metres is difficult - normally the only way to get below cell level is to have access to the raw signal information that the service providers use. I believe that there is a triangulation system possible to get below cell size using that data.

As to what's on sale in Meadowhell, I'd expect it to be capable of resolving to cell level, but would be surprised if it was better than that. I would have thought that the only way to get down to metre level is for the phone to be using some sort of geopositioning system then broadcasting the results.

Just a few thoughts,

Joe

JoeP
24-10-2004, 08:14
There have been stories in the media recently about people at some night clubs and such being tagged in their arm so they don't have to carry money or plastic. Quite an interesting application but I don't like letting people know too much about me and where I am!!

As for the DNA - I object to having my DNA on record for the same reason I would object to a mandatory fingerprint record or having my phone tapped; it's an invasion of my privacy. In the same way I object to RFID tags in good we buy that cannot be removed at the point of sale - I have no wish to walk around Meadowhall or any where else telling every RFID scanner in the vicinty that I've been to M&S, Boots, WH Smiths and Dixons.

If you want to stop crime, there are three things to do.

Start creating a climate in society in which criminal behaviour, at all levels, from a chav stealing a car to a Prince of the Realm punching a photographer, is frowned upon and generally accepted as a 'bad thing'.

Put a policing system together that employs people on the ground to enforce the law and provide a presence that increases confidence in the population.

Have a legislative system that works quickly and openly to punish wrongdoers in an appropriate and timely manner.

Solutions that work by treating everyone as a potential criminal are not likely to gain widespread support and will cause a further breakdown in trust between governed and Government.

It's SUnday and I haven't had a coffee yet.....grump...:)

Joe

russellhanab
24-10-2004, 15:39
The ISP has many advantages over agressive types of self-defense:

An ISP is child safe.

The violence of the attack can rupture the ISP without any deliberate action by the victim.

It does not escalate violence.

It deters attackers whether it is present or not. The attacker will have doubt that one is not present.

An ISP can be openly displayed deterring attack.

An ISP is compact and lite the size of a button.

The ISP is low cost and no maintenance.

more.... www.adaisi.com

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 15:43
I sense an increase in the sales of surgical gloves and shotguns. Shoot victim with untraceable buckshot, rifle through pockets and get hold their belongings with no DNA transfer...

russellhanab
24-10-2004, 17:09
While the ISP is not effective against remote attacks it will spare the victim from undergoing an extended brutal handling by the attacker.

The ISP was invented specifically to prevent violent crime.

What is needed now is awareness of the ISP:

* The Public needs to be infromed of the ISP so that there will be demand for it.

* Manufacturers need to be informed of the ISP so they will produce it and quickly.

* Potential attackers need to be informed of the ISP so they will not strike.

Spreading awareness of the ISP quickens the day when manual violent crime is rare and punished with quickness and certainty.

Cols
24-10-2004, 17:26
Originally posted by JoePritchard

As for the DNA - I object to having my DNA on record for the same reason I would object to a mandatory fingerprint record or having my phone tapped; it's an invasion of my privacy.
Joe

Couldn't agree more. But it's worse than losing ones privacy. Imagine all our DNA is on a database. All a criminal/enemy/bent copper would have to do to frame you for a crime is to pick up a cigarette that you've just discarded, take a strand of hair off your shoulder etc, and leave it at the scene of a crime. I do believe that DNA can be useful but it can all too easily be abused.
What is an invasion of privacy is the current practice of being DNA sampled if arrested and the sample not being destroyed if proved innocent at a later date.

Sony
24-10-2004, 17:48
I just can't believe this world sometimes... With violent crime commited every day, why can't anything be done about it?? This new invention is ok in theory, but the good old fashion way is the best thing to tackle crime... bobbys on the beat.
We simply need lots of them, on every street, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.. It may sound harsh but those who have commited murder should be shot. Introducing death penalty would deter a lot of potential criminals I'm sure.. Whats is the point of keeping criminals in prison these days, its just a holiday for them. All they probably do in there is make friends and congratulate each other on how violent and basically how great criminals they are...
God, its so simple to work out... The world has gone too soft...

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 17:52
Hmmmm yes cos the death penalty works so well in places where its in place doesn't it?

Sony
24-10-2004, 17:55
Originally posted by evildrneil
Hmmmm yes cos the death penalty works so well in places where its in place doesn't it?

Oh come on, you know what I mean... Murderers are killers at the end of the day... What would you do if you had a gun and a lion was ready to eat you for breakfast?? Kill it, or tell him to stop and make he promise not to eat you again??

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 18:00
Thats hardly a sane comparison to make is it? Basically if the death penalty was effective it would never be used - the simple fact it is shows it isn't an effective deterrent.

The problem is much more one of society than simply throwing police at the problem - the responsibility for a healthy society lies with everyone and the more dissociated people feel from society the more crime will thrive...

Sony
24-10-2004, 18:07
Originally posted by evildrneil
Thats hardly a sane comparison to make is it? Basically if the death penalty was effective it would never be used - the simple fact it is shows it isn't an effective deterrent.

The problem is much more one of society than simply throwing police at the problem - the responsibility for a healthy society lies with everyone and the more dissociated people feel from society the more crime will thrive...

We know that this will never happen... Society has always had its middle class people and lower classes and criminals, and always will... Some people are just a waste of space... So whats the point of keeping them?? Sounds harsh, but its true... Think about the bloke who shot another one near the afro carrabean club on spital hill, what the hell do you suggest we do with him?? He is never ever in a million years going to be a respectable chap!

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 19:19
So what next? The disabled? crippled?? out of work??? stupid???? You could make a (harsh) argument that they are not contributing to societ and so a waste of space. Can you say 'thin edge of the wedge'?

Sony
24-10-2004, 19:30
Originally posted by evildrneil
So what next? The disabled? crippled?? out of work??? stupid???? You could make a (harsh) argument that they are not contributing to societ and so a waste of space. Can you say 'thin edge of the wedge'?

Rubbish.... I'm talking about criminals here...

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 19:58
You were talking about people who are a 'waste of space' - so who makes that decision, how far do you trust them and just what happens when they get it wrong - and they will...

evildrneil
24-10-2004, 20:01
BTW would anyone trust a high tech inventor who can't spell 'miniature'!

russellhanab
25-10-2004, 02:15
The ISP provides 24/7 protection under almost all conditions even while sleeping.

The elderly disabled and children can all use the ISP effectively.

It can also be required that all violent parolees wear goverment issued ISPs at all times. Any unexplained loss or rupture of the ISP will return the parolee to incarceration.

www.adaisi.com

russellhanab
20-11-2004, 05:08
The ISP promises to provide to all people with the possibility of protection in the eye of the attacker. An ISP can be in almost any object like jewelry, band-aids, earrings, watches, jewelry, ect. To the attacker even a sleeping child can be protected.

A person whodoes not use an ISP has the presumption that he could be.

However, if you are attacked having an ISP is better. An ISP can deter, abort, help the victim escape, drive-off the attacker, and convict the attacker. At every incremental stage of the attack the ISP gives the attacker well understood signals to stop as follows:

1. The victim displaying an ISP proves to the attacker that one is present. At this point he can just walk away.

2. Sensing that an attack was eminent the victim has deliberately ruptured the ISP and spreads its content over herself. The victim is now unappealing and covered with tissue samples. The attacker is prompted to just walk away.

3. One ISP is ruptured and the attacker is tissue sampled. At this point the attacker can still try to explain to the police that his tissue sampling as just an accident. He is tissue sampled running won’t help him now.

4. Multiple ISPs are ruptured and the attacker is tissue sampled. Explaining this away is more difficult the rupture of multiple ISP does not occur by accident.

5. The attacker is tissue sampled and a special ISP has released an irritating substance. This substance drives-off the attacker with a horrible smell and itchiness.

6. The attacker is tissue sampled and the victim is injured. The attacker best cover story comes from stopping the attack, summoning medical care, and calling the police to explain his ‘innocent’ version for the events.

7. The ISP is ruptured and the victim is obviously attacked and dead. Now the attacker is on the run. The tissue sample evidence and RFID contamination assures that his run will be brief.

The ISP instantly gives the attacker the feeling of being tissue sampled. He will know that as he precedes with his attack that more and more DNA evidence and RFID contamination is happening to him. Proceeding with this gritty feeling and knowledge is likely to change the attacker’s mood and change the attacker’s course of action.

However, if he is the kind of attacker who proceeds even under such obvious conditions for punishment then he is not to be allowed freedom again. He has demonstrated that he will press an attack despite certain punishment. There no other place for him than incarceration.

To see ISP animation

http://www.adaisi.com/CONTENT/animation/animation.gif