View Full Version : Bush or Kerry. Which one would you trust?
uncleheed 21-10-2004, 19:47 If you had to go to the polls to vote for any of these two,who would it be?
And I don't want a choice based on policies,I want it based on your impressions of them as people.
My take on Bush is he looks like Mr Benn.
I think Kerry looks like a bit of a kiddie fiddler who I wouldn't trust with a bag of rubbish.
I know Bush is a buffoon,but I would sooner have Mr Benn running the world rather than Gary Glitter!
P.S. Mods,this is meant as a bit of fun!
Originally posted by uncleheed
If you had to go to the polls to vote for any of these two,who would it be?
And I don't want a choice based on policies,I want it based on your impressions of them as people.
My take on Bush is he looks like Mr Benn.
I think Kerry looks like a bit of a kiddie fiddler who I wouldn't trust with a bag of rubbish.
I know Bush is a buffoon,but I would sooner have Mr Benn running the world rather than Gary Glitter!
P.S. Mods,this is meant as a bit of fun!
mr benn had better suits as well:D :D :D
ladyovmanor 21-10-2004, 20:57 Has to be Kerry. Least we dont know he's a liar (yet)
evildrneil 21-10-2004, 21:01 Given the cock up Bush has made of well everything I think a strategically shaved ape would be preferable!
A.B.Yaffle 22-10-2004, 01:41 I think whoever wins this time is going to be ousted in 4 years. If Bush wins then he will have to leave in 2008 because presidents are only allowed two terms. If Kerry wins I think it will only be because of anti-Bush voters rather for his own policies or personality, and I don't think he would get re-elected... unless maybe Jed Bush runs against him in 2008!
On impressions from the way they look - Kerry does look weird, he gives me the creeps, while Bush has this kind of comical hunch backed shuffle about him, he makes me larf, so unfortunatly it would be Bush the vacant one.
royjames 22-10-2004, 10:13 On first impresions it has to be bush,he seems to have more conviction than kerry.
I'd probably rather hang out with Bush, the bloke is a filthy rich lunatic, which would be a fun combination.
Not an ideal combination for running the most powerful nation on earth though...
Bush all the way for me,,,
He's a little bit unstable and not afraid to make decisions which others may not totally agree with...
Go bush,,,,,,
Bush all the way, we cannot change comandering chief in the middle of a war !
Oh my lord….do this many people really think Bush is good? Surely not…
DaBouncer 22-10-2004, 11:22 I'd say better the devil you know - keep Bush for one last term. Make him see out this cock up in the Gulf!
I don't know about voting but I certainly wouldn't like to get in a car driven by GW given his drink driving convictions. Which we'll never find details of as they have been removed and archived, illegally, allegedly.
On the issue of the American election I came across this the other day:
Dear Limey assholes
Last week G2 launched Operation Clark County to help readers have a say in the American election by writing to undecided voters in the crucial state of Ohio. In the first three days, more than 11,000 people requested addresses. Here is some of the reaction to the project that we received from the US
(Swearing alert....)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1329858,00.html
Originally posted by poppins
Bush all the way, we cannot change comandering chief in the middle of a war !
So thats it. The easy way for an incumbent President to get re-elected is to start a war. Come to think of it, it was probably the plan all along.
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler
I'd say better the devil you know - keep Bush for one last term. Make him see out this cock up in the Gulf!
You actually think he will sort it out? And there won't be any more cock ups over the 4 years. And he won't get the Americans into such a state of blind fear that they will then go on to elect his brother for the following 8 years?
There was a program on BBC2 the other night about how the neo-cons (Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz etc) actively lied to the American public in the 70's about the nature of the Soviet threat to ensure the fear was there to allow them to carry out their policies.
This was after Nixon and Kissinger had started to halt Nuclear proliferation with agreements with Brezhnev.
Once the Soviet threat had disappeared, they needed a new one - hence the War on Terror and all the fear that goes along with that.
They believe fear is the only way to unite the American public.
These people think they are doing the right thing, but unfortunately they are misguided lunatics.
The world is not safe in their hands............
Phanerothyme 22-10-2004, 12:05 Elect Kerry or Bush, same people stay in power....
Elect Nader, tee hee.
Seriously though I thought we had it bad with the representational democratic version of a one party state here, but in the US it's a lot worse.
This isn't politics, this is circus.
If Bush wins (or loses like last time) and gets another 4 years, maybe the sane countries in the world can get together to instigate regime change in the U.S.
It would be so easy, all it needs is for China and Japan to call in their debts and the country would collapse.
PS. dear FBI/CIA internet monitors.....I am only joking.
|
|