ok then, since my Rachel Stevens thread has been removed i have decided to settle an argument between me and my brother.

Please vote!!!

It's clear to see who is sexier, and its Holly Valance shes got such a cute baby face. Thats not saying Rachel Stevens isn't sexy!!

http://www.deagle.co.uk/gallery/images/holly/main_page/1.jpg

enough said

http://pictures.celebscentral.net/rachelstevens/26.jpg
enlarge it as well

Can anyone actually tell the difference between these bland, plastic schlebs???

Originally posted by evildrneil
Can anyone actually tell the difference between these bland, plastic schlebs???


Yeah, one's career is over, the other is ABOUT to be over.

cant believe im the first.

but both!

or out of 10, id give em both 1!

rachel is so ickle, and cute!

Holly Valance?! Hmmm, I would ;)

i knew Rachel who get more votes.

lets get more people voting

Rachel at a choice, but I'd do both of them ;)

Originally posted by evildrneil
Can anyone actually tell the difference between these bland, plastic schlebs???

Not a 'singer', I know, but much, much better to get a load of Kirsty Gallacher.

Sexy or what.

Originally posted by longley owl
enough said

http://pictures.celebscentral.net/rachelstevens/26.jpg
enlarge it as well

She looks about 12 in that picture. I'd feel like a paedophile if I thought she looked sexy. :nono:

I voted Holly but I never go for very young and small pretty girls anyway because they don't come across to me as sexy. I think true sexyness is in the personality. ;)

Originally posted by Pauly
I think true sexyness is in the personality. ;)

Agree 100% :thumbsup:

(But I voted for Holly as well :wink: )

The thing with both of these girls is that none of them would really be looked at twice if they were just normal girls in the street. But add some top make up artists and stylists and some clever camera work, as well as a hyped up media reputation, and any woman becomes a plastic doll that men will go mad over because the media told them to.

Originally posted by Pauly
She looks about 12 in that picture. I'd feel like a paedophile if I thought she looked sexy. :nono:

I voted Holly but I never go for very young and small pretty girls anyway because they don't come across to me as sexy. I think true sexyness is in the personality. ;)
You mean they don't come across to you at all :P

I hate to disagree with you toto, but I am sure both girls would be looked at more than twice if they were just ordinary girls in the street. Both are very attractive, pretty girls, with figures to match, and I am sure they would turn many heads even as 'ordinary girls in the street'.

I'm not allowed to vote (or so I've been told), but the males in my family have opted for Holly Valance.

P.S. Your standards must be exceedingly high if these two don't do it for you.

Originally posted by Killian
I hate to disagree with you toto, but I am sure both girls would be looked at more than twice if they were just ordinary girls in the street. Both are very attractive, pretty girls, with figures to match, and I am sure they would turn many heads even as 'ordinary girls in the street'.


But thats the point isn't it? If they were ordinary girls they wouldn't have professional stylists, make up artists, fashion consultants, etc, to doll them up would they? I've not seen either "undolled" up but a good example is Britney Spears. The media have always portrayed her as some really pretty sex symbol but there have also been plenty of photos taken of her when shes not expected it and they show her in her true colours, and she looks quite ugly and usually has a roll of fat or 2.

I agree with Killian.
If they were just girls in the street I'd look twice at them.:thumbsup:

I voted for Holly Valance also :D

Originally posted by Killian
I hate to disagree with you toto, but I am sure both girls would be looked at more than twice if they were just ordinary girls in the street. Both are very attractive, pretty girls, with figures to match, and I am sure they would turn many heads even as 'ordinary girls in the street'.

I'm not allowed to vote (or so I've been told), but the males in my family have opted for Holly Valance.

P.S. Your standards must be exceedingly high if these two don't do it for you.

I'd agree that both girls would turn heads in the street and I'm not saying that I wouldn't look if I happened to pass them because as I go from job to job in the work-van me and the guy I'm with are always looking around like typical lads do. I'd still not go near them though as I don't go for that type. Personal preference, not a question of standards.

Originally posted by Dirk Diggler
You mean they don't come across to you at all :P

Oh shush :P

Originally posted by t020
, to doll them up would they?

Aren't all girls who go out on a Friday/Saturday night dolled up then? I'm sure most of us look completely different in our 'natural state'. You don't seem to have much of a clue about women, if you don't mind me saying so.

Originally posted by Pauly
I'd agree that both girls would turn heads in the street and I'm not saying that I wouldn't look if I happened to pass them because as I go from job to job in the work-van me and the guy I'm with are always looking around like typical lads do. I'd still not go near them though as I don't go for that type. Personal preference, not a question of standards.

Just for the way someone looks isnt everything... I would have to agree with what you say Pauly... I believe everything in a person male/female comes from within... after all that is where the heart is... :)

Tut white van drivers :lol:

Originally posted by t020
The thing with both of these girls is that none of them would really be looked at twice if they were just normal girls in the street. But add some top make up artists and stylists and some clever camera work, as well as a hyped up media reputation, and any woman becomes a plastic doll that men will go mad over because the media told them to.

I feel that anyone who is on the telly is always done up to nines mind you it has to be done for the camera lights etc...

If i were to go on telly... i too could become attractive to a large number of men... hard to believe but it could be true :lol:

Like these make overs that people have done... They make you look so diff... My friend back down south bless her... looked fab but didnt look like the person i knew :lol:

Natural people are best :) not 100% natural mind :lol:

Hmmm....would probably place a vote for Rachel Stevens but have to say I think her stylists should be shot.

There was an interview in, I think, The Times last week and the photos made her look much older and 'harder'. I assume it's a new look and image she's cultivating but it certainly didn't appeal to me.

She's naturally a good looking young woman who would, IMHO, be better advised to play to her strengths rather than try and change her looks and image.

That's just me, though!

Joe

Originally posted by JoePritchard
Hmmm....would probably place a vote for Rachel Stevens but have to say I think her stylists should be shot.

There was an interview in, I think, The Times last week and the photos made her look much older and 'harder'. I assume it's a new look and image she's cultivating but it certainly didn't appeal to me.

She's naturally a good looking young woman who would, IMHO, be better advised to play to her strengths rather than try and change her looks and image.

That's just me, though!

Joe

I think Rachel knows shes a good looking girl... Holly Vallance is more down to earth!

Originally posted by Killian
Aren't all girls who go out on a Friday/Saturday night dolled up then?

The slight difference being that they don't have a group of professional stylists and make up artists to doll them up, or a camera man that knows all the best lighting, angles and poses. You can't even begin to compare the two at all.

Holly Valance any time for me :D

Originally posted by t020
The slight difference being that they don't have a group of professional stylists and make up artists to doll them up, or a camera man that knows all the best lighting, angles and poses. You can't even begin to compare the two at all.

If you can't even begin to compare the two then surely the difference is more than just 'slight'. Saying that as well I bet if you put two girls together, one a regular girl on a night out and another dressed up and styled by professionals I'd challenge you to tell the difference at a glance. ;)

Originally posted by Pauly
If you can't even begin to compare the two then surely the difference is more than just 'slight'.

I know, it was an emphasised, sarcastic "slight".