View Full Version : Guardian Article


alevans
24-05-2006, 07:57
Mods, if this has already been posted feel free to pull it, as I expect you wil.
Al

Please use the Report Abuse page to complain about a message.

Topic - "Sheffo - best city in the world"? (Guardian article)
by - Marc C on - 07:49 Wed
James Graham
Wednesday May 24, 2006
The Guardian

The humble fanzine, with its crude DIY cut-and-paste design, was a form of expression that blossomed in the punk era, a publishing phenomenon that enabled spotty teenagers to hold forth about their favourite bands and football clubs . . . and, now, regeneration.
At the launch of Sheffield's five-year strategic plan last October, a 23-year-old former civil servant, who goes under the pseudonym Tom Common, could be seen handing out leaflets. They looked like something to do with an established political campaign. But it was a manifesto, a call to arms for a more radical approach to Sheffield's regeneration. Common was distributing his alternative strategic plan, which exhorted the city's leaders to make bold, brave decisions to turn it into the greenest city in the north, celebrate the modern architecture, and make more of its cultural heritage.
"Sheffield isn't a big city or a high-rise city in the same way that Manchester or Birmingham are," it read. "We don't need to ape those other cities. We have enough heritage and culture and ideas to forge our own identity. It's all here in front of us. If you want a city strategy, all you need to do is open your eyes."
The city's official plan listed "five big ambitions", which included the desire to make the city "exciting and magnetic", to have an economy that "matches the best cities in Europe" and to "re-establish excellence in its public transport". These ambitions were underpinned by 12 features that Sheffield First Partnership, the quango charged with spearheading the changes, believes define a successful city, including "low crime", "great place to grow up", and a "vibrant city centre".
Common complains: "It's supposed to be a vision for the city, but it doesn't have any understanding of why Sheffield is different. Everything they said can be applied to any city in the world."
Common's manifesto offered a taste of his fanzine, Go, which is billed as being about "Sheffo - the best city in the world". Reasons for such adoration include "bus drivers and butchers who call you love and duck", "The Peaks: you're the f*cking DUDE man", and the city's vibrant music scene, from The Human League in the 1980s and Pulp in the 1990s to today's Arctic Monkeys. "It's friendly, green, creative and, above all, different," Common says of the city.
Go has been going for nearly two years, with each of the free 20-page editions - nine to date - taking a different theme. One celebrated all the reasons why Sheffield is different from other cities; another was titled Park Hill v City Living, and called for the iconic flats on the hill by the station to be celebrated as "Sheffield's Guggenheim, its Baltic, its Tate Modern", while lambasting the tedious boxy designs of many city-centre flats.
Each edition is low-tech in the classic 1980s pop fanzine style, adorned with black and white photocopied pictures, cut-and-paste layout, and lots of old typewriter print. The words are direct, brash and confrontational. "It seemed like an appropriate format," Common says. "Low-fi and scruffy, like the city. We don't want the city to stay scruffy, but we do want it to keep its integrity."
The publication began as a reaction to the banal messages coming out of the city council. "We started it to simply say that Sheffield was an amazing place, because no one else really was," says Common, who puts the fanzine together with two friends, who also use pseudonyms - Tom Hydro and Roy Disco.
"The council's literature was just trying to be the next Leeds, Manchester . . . The plans were empty and had no soul. It needs something on its own scale, an appropriate development rather than generic plate glass. It's worth more than that."
"Who needs ****y bars and Harvey Nichols? They can frig off," says Hydro in issue two. "The stark concrete and brick facades glow with a simplicity that makes my spirits lift."
So has this endeavour led to any results? "We've had lots of contact with people at the council, particularly the planning department, but also with Anne Gosse, director of culture," Common says. "We believe there are a lot of bigwigs who are aware of us, but have to show outward loyalty to the council." Common thinks these "bigwigs" are starting to listen to Go's ideas, and are more aware of brewing discontent. "We would like to change people's perception of the city," he says. "Most people in the city think it's fantastic, but those over the hills, they haven't got a clue. It's a fantastic secret, but the city seems to have a bit of a crisis of self-confidence. It needs to shout about itself."
However, Sir Robert Kerslake, chief executive of the city council, deputy chair of Sheffield First and board member of the new Creative Sheffield, defends the regeneration plans. "Overall, the feedback we've had has been very positive," he says. "There's a lot of ambitious stuff happening, particularly in the public realm. If you look at what we've created in the Peace Gardens and around the station, I don't think anybody could say that's not ambitious. I disagree with his [Common's] analysis."
Around £130m has been spent on the Peace Gardens, Millennium Galleries and the Winter Garden, which frame the commercial development of St Paul's Place. So far it has attracted the kind of blue-chip clients the council was after - the insurer Standard Life and the law firm DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary.
Go tackled this flagship redevelopment in its very first issue, praising the creation of the Peace and Winter Gardens - "What regeneration means when it's well done" - but it took a demolition ball to the council's other plans. Common listed his grievances. The hotel will obscure the Winter Garden, he wrote, while St Paul's Place was reminiscent of the "bland, instantly decaying office blocks of the 1970s."
He praised the council's bravery for building next to the town hall, and acknowledged the need to keep private investors on side. But he added: "This is Sheffield city centre. It is the best opportunity Sheffield will have to cast off its ugly image, to build something today, something that will compare with the cathedral, the library, the Victorian centre of the city, and which will complement the Winter Garden. People want something beautiful.
"Why have the council okayed something that doesn't meet this criteria? . . . These buildings are dull, ugly and a waste." The plans exhibit "architectural poverty" rather than the grandiose posturing of landmark buildings in other cities, such as Manchester's Urbis.
Eighteen months later, he is no less vehement. "There are some people with big ideas doing fantastic things - see Urban Splash in Manchester," he says. "But for the most part, especially in Sheffield, it's just small-minded people with no ambition. Everything seems to end up mediocre."
But Bill Kirk, chief executive of urban regeneration firm Sheffield One, insists that cutting-edge designers and property developers such as Urban Splash are signed up to revamp the Park Hill estate.
Common and his colleagues have come up with one big idea that might just leap from Go's pages and become a reality. They want to use the disused cooling towers by the M1 at Meadowhall as super-scale, public art - as Sheffield's version of the Angel of the North. The idea was entered in Channel 4's Big Art Project competition and has made the final six from thousands of entries. Common wants to turn a remnant of the old Sheffield into a new symbol. "Sheffield is the first city in the north of England, and these towers stand as a gateway . . . for those coming home or going away. Basically, a big public work of art here would mean something to half the country. That's quite a big audience. It's the best idea Sheffield has ever had."

JoeP
24-05-2006, 08:46
I'm trying really hard to think why we'd want to pull this?

Might disagree with it, but pull it.....Nah.

fox20thc
24-05-2006, 08:49
Can you edit it and break it up a bit (aging eyesight) its a bit hard to read.

Strix
24-05-2006, 08:54
I think Joe may need to do that (or a mod) as Alevans seems to have hit and run ;)

CaptainSwing
24-05-2006, 09:01
Can you edit it and break it up a bit (aging eyesight) its a bit hard to read.
Could just post a link (http://society.guardian.co.uk/communities/story/0,,1781234,00.html) to the article itself, which is a bit better formatted.

KenH
24-05-2006, 09:09
I have just read this article. I think I agree with everything he is saying. The qangos that are "regenerating" the city are just trying to be another Leeds or to simply build tall buildings because thats what you have in cities. He is calling for an emphasis on what is special about the city, particularly how green it is. He isn't saying we shouldn't do exciting things, only that they shouldn't be the same as everywhere else. If you had to pick something that was unique about sheffield then what would it be? After they do all the planned developments, then what will it be? Will we say "Sheffield is special because we now have another retain quarter with another few hundes shops"?

Le Phantom
24-05-2006, 09:51
This makes a number of useful points and I can't think why the OP thinks it would be pulled.

Perhaps the best point is that Sheffield needs to be it's own place and not as some of the suits want, a carbon copy European city. It's all the better for not being Leeds and can't economically compete with Manchester so carve Sheffield's own niche based on existing strengths.

I also agree the St Pauls development is a missed opportunity the buildings are truly horrid and crowds the spectacular Winter Gardens.

However, improving public transport and the roads has to come before any more grandiose plans, more than anything people need to be able to get about.

boyface
24-05-2006, 10:35
Go Sheffo, I salute thee.

NicholasB
24-05-2006, 11:36
I agree with what Tom Common is saying. He's on the forum isn't he - I'm sure I remembering him posting about the cooling towers.

Agent Gypo
24-05-2006, 11:44
Go Sheffield is the best magazine in Sheffield.

Not for long though.

alevans
24-05-2006, 11:58
thread about this on another forum at
http://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/t.php?n=183372

Mattski
24-05-2006, 13:11
God, what's wrong with people?

This is exactly the sort of tedious parochial attitude that has held the city back for so long. Whilst I agree that the city's heritage and culture should be celebrated and that the Tinsley cooling towers would make a great landmark, I can't see how anyone can realistically hope for Sheffield to progress without 'w*nky bars and Harvey Nichols', in that we live in a society that loves its shopping and socializing.

There is a very definate luddite strain to Sheffield's demographic and this is a good example of how it can be dressed up as something cool and alternative. In fact, it comes across as infantile, rebelling against a current system that we have been too slow to adapt to with the eye-rollingly pretentious justification that falling down, sick building sysndrome, modernist Sheffield is uber-cool and iconic with sixth former irony. Post-modernist pish!

Le Phantom
24-05-2006, 13:22
God, what's wrong with people?

This is exactly the sort of tedious parochial attitude that has held the city back for so long. Whilst I agree that the city's heritage and culture should be celebrated and that the Tinsley cooling towers would make a great landmark, I can't see how anyone can realistically hope for Sheffield to progress without 'w*nky bars and Harvey Nichols', in that we live in a society that loves its shopping and socializing.

There is a very definate luddite strain to Sheffield's demographic and this is a good example of how it can be dressed up as something cool and alternative. In fact, it comes across as infantile, rebelling against a current system that we have been too slow to adapt to with the eye-rollingly pretentious justification that falling down, sick building sysndrome, modernist Sheffield is uber-cool and iconic with sixth former irony. Post-modernist pish!

Complete tosh, that is exactly the go with the herd attitude that gave us the 60's & 70's concrete jungle, tower blocks and sink estates.

Burning white hot technology anyone? Or do the words Emperor and clothes come to mind!

boyface
24-05-2006, 13:39
I can't see how anyone can realistically hope for Sheffield to progress without 'w*nky bars and Harvey Nichols', in that we live in a society that loves its shopping and socializing.


Harvey Nicholls....the way of the future.

I wouldnt live in a city without one.

Christ.

Mattski
24-05-2006, 13:45
But Le Phantom it's pure utopian fantasy.

If the city has always followed everyone else why are we now so far behind? It doesn't make sense.

I think that the reason why we are so far behind is that we are pulled between those who have one eye on the past and those who innovate beyond our current comfort levels. The result is that we settle for mediocrity.

There are actually no solutions presented by Tom Common in this article, just cheap criticism of the current position. It is self regarding, quasi nostalgic guff. The paragraph where he says that he wouldn't want to be regarded as a regeneration consultant is laughable. A good bloody job.

Le Phantom
24-05-2006, 14:17
But Le Phantom it's pure utopian fantasy.

If the city has always followed everyone else why are we now so far behind? It doesn't make sense.

I think that the reason why we are so far behind is that we are pulled between those who have one eye on the past and those who innovate beyond our current comfort levels. The result is that we settle for mediocrity.

There are actually no solutions presented by Tom Common in this article, just cheap criticism of the current position. It is self regarding, quasi nostalgic guff. The paragraph where he says that he wouldn't want to be regarded as a regeneration consultant is laughable. A good bloody job.

I'm not suggesting and haven't above, that his is the way forward, but nor is blind follow my leader, let's all be like each other - one size fits all - good news either.

I don't think Sheffield has followed any particular lead or plan until the last 5 years or so. Thereby it's charm and its failings. Ie not enough development and the politics of the past and you get decay. Equally it's lack of rushed development meant it did not inherit the awful designs both Leeds and Manchester (till the IRA bomb ironically) have suffered with.

Thus it's important to hear the criticism that there are parts that must be preserved to keep our charachter and make us unique. How sick are most people of one High Street model that has the same shops and could be anywhere?

Look to buildings that wear well, have unique features and something "Sheffield" about them. The mosaic of the steel worker near the courts will stand the test of time. As will the Winter Gardens, some of the St Paul's developments will not. The Victorian Crescent of buildings facing them have.

Make Sheffield a place that people want to live in and come to, not just a later arriving Leeds (God preserve us).

Mattski
24-05-2006, 14:30
Le Phantom,

I think we would probably agree on some ways of developing Sheffield and disagree on others. What offends me particularly in this article is the subtle resistance to change; this seems to permeate through all levels of Sheffield society and means that when we do get media attention we tend to shout about what used to be great about Sheffield and not what it can become, look at the recent Richard Hawley interview in the Guardian for a good example of this.

Of course, change for changes sake should never be encouraged either but until the residents of Sheffield can be educated to understand what is possible they will never see beyond the horizon. I think people here are happy to settle for the substandard as long as they have their memories.

chris@25
24-05-2006, 14:34
I don't think Sheffield has followed any particular lead or plan until the last 5 years or so. Thereby it's charm and its failings. Ie not enough development and the politics of the past and you get decay. Equally it's lack of rushed development meant it did not inherit the awful designs both Leeds and Manchester (till the IRA bomb ironically) have suffered with.

If you think Sheffield had a better city centre than Manchester prior to 1996 then you must never have been there. Sheffield had lots of development in the 1960s and that is the city centre's main problem.

I agree with Mattski that the Go Sheffo stuff does run the risk of making insular little mester-ish backwardness look cool and hip and forward looking when it isn't.

But likewise Sheffield's attempts to change in the past have suffered both from mediocrity (especially obvious lately) and socialist hubris (especially in the past). And they are right that Sheffield has a wierd, ugly-beautiful, big-small, left-field air about it and the council's attempts to be Leeds Mark 2 or Stuttgart Mark 4 as reported in some Guardian piece a few weeks ago will result only in more mediocrity.

Maybe it's just me though, but I think I sense something of the self-confidence that Manchester discovered in the early 90s seeping into Sheffield as a whole - I don't think that has come from the council, all they can do is (hopefully) not mess things up.

Sheffield, like Manchester and Liverpool, has produced a lot of pop culture despite (or because of) being left to its own devices, and is of historical / industrial significance. Leeds on the other hand is a small mill town next to Bradford with some nice shops, no matter what their image consultants say - we don't need to slavishly copy them.

Le Phantom
24-05-2006, 14:40
Le Phantom,

I think we would probably agree on some ways of developing Sheffield and disagree on others. What offends me particularly in this article is the subtle resistance to change; this seems to permeate through all levels of Sheffield society and means that when we do get media attention we tend to shout about what used to be great about Sheffield and not what it can become, look at the recent Richard Hawley interview in the Guardian for a good example of this.

Of course, change for changes sake should never be encouraged either but until the residents of Sheffield can be educated to understand what is possible they will never see beyond the horizon. I think people here are happy to settle for the substandard as long as they have their memories.

Well count me out of accepting substandard and living in the past. However, count me in on preserving our heritage and having a unique Sheffield development model.

An example from the US springs to mind, it's just to illustrate the point. In the 60's and 70's the West Coast of the US was developing exponentially and LA and San Francisco were leading a lot of it. San Francisco developed a model in sympathy with it's past and not development at any price. In LA they bunged up an awful lot of poorly thought out high rise. I lived in both and give me San Fran any day.

Now this is the challenge to architects, planners and enterprise, how do you keep a places charachter, preserve that which is worth preserving and be economically viable? I think we bounce between short term economic imperatives and wallowing in nostalgia. As per usual the way forward is more complex but worth the effort.

Mattski
24-05-2006, 14:49
But i'm not from San Fransisco, i'm from Hunter's Bar.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Seriously though, I can't speak about LA but i'm not sure we should be looking stateside for inspiration in city planning. I found SF to be heartless in the city (civic centre for example, god did they get that wrong, although SOMA is interesting in a 80s yuppie way) and uninspiring in the inner districts. As the best that the West Coast had to offer I was disappointed. Still, the transamerica pyramid is fantastic.

Le Phantom
24-05-2006, 15:18
But i'm not from San Fransisco, i'm from Hunter's Bar.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Seriously though, I can't speak about LA but i'm not sure we should be looking stateside for inspiration in city planning. I found SF to be heartless in the city (civic centre for example, god did they get that wrong, although SOMA is interesting in a 80s yuppie way) and uninspiring in the inner districts. As the best that the West Coast had to offer I was disappointed. Still, the transamerica pyramid is fantastic.

Could see that coming :) which is why I said just to illustrate the point - if you think SF is bad defo stick to Hunters Bar and never, on any account, go to LA.

We may agree more than this looks like, however it's funny how things go and then come around again. When I was a kid growing up in Manchester (so yes I do know it) in the 60's anything Victorian was considered awful, anything involving developing the M6 and concrete good!

Now the Town Hall looks pretty good and much that is left form the 60's & 70's awful - like multi-storey car park awful.